用户名: 密码: 验证码:
西山煤田生态变化的遥感监测与评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Remote sensing monitoring and evaluation of the ecological changes in Xishan coalfield
  • 作者:周玄德 ; 窦文章 ; 李国栋
  • 英文作者:ZHOU XuANDe;DOU Wenzhang;LI Guodong;College of Resource and Environmental Science,Xinjiang University;Beijing Boya Strategy Traveling Research Institute;School of Software and Microelectronics,Peking University;Institute for Strategic Research,Peking University;
  • 关键词:遥感 ; 生态指数 ; 监测 ; 时空变化 ; 西山煤田
  • 英文关键词:remote sensing;;ecological index;;monitoring;;space-time change;;Xishan coalfield
  • 中文刊名:中国矿业
  • 英文刊名:China Mining Magazine
  • 机构:新疆大学资源与环境科学学院;北京博雅方略旅游研究院;北京大学软件与微电子学院;北京大学战略研究所;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-15
  • 出版单位:中国矿业
  • 年:2019
  • 期:01
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目资助(编号:41661036;U1603241);; 新疆自治区研究生科研创新项目资助(编号:XJGRI2014020)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:111-117+124
  • 页数:8
  • CN:11-3033/TD
  • ISSN:1004-4051
  • 分类号:X87
摘要
新时代,生态环境问题越来越受到国家、社会和民众的重视。选取西山煤田矿区为研究对象,通过遥感手段,借助遥感生态指数模型,对生态环境进行动态监测。结果表明:研究区遥感生态指数波动趋势明显,2004年遥感生态指数为0.639,2010年该指数为0.694,增长了0.056,2016年为0.655,2016年相比2010年下降了0.039,总体表现为倒"V"型态势;研究区遥感生态指数主要以良为主,2004年、2010年、2016年依次分别占总面积的63.74%、75.94%、58.77%;不同类型的遥感生态指数重心均发生了偏移,其中A级、B级生态指数的重心偏移量较高,2004~2010年偏移量为37.172km、31.255km,2010~2016年偏移量为15.270km、18.814km;对遥感生态指数的作用强度中,热度的作用最显著,相关度高达0.859,植被的作用次之,相关系数为0.799,干度的作用强度0.707,湿度的作用最小,相关系数为0.596。研究发现,研究区西北区域的主矿区生态好转,东南居住区域生态恶化,生态优质区域在远离人类活动,向北转移,该区域地形相对复杂,人类活动干扰相对较少。
        Under the new era,the ecological environment problems are more and more emphasized by the state,society and people.By means of remote sensing and ecological index model,the dynamic monitoring of the ecological environment is carried out by selecting Xishan coalfield as the research object.The results show that the trend of remote sensing ecological index in the research area is obvious,and the remote sensing ecology index is 0.639 in 2004,0.694 in 2010,0.655 in 2010,the overall performance being inverted "V"pattern;the ecological index of remote sensing in the study area is mainly good,and the 2004,2010 and 2016 respectively account for 63.74%,75.94% and 58.77% of the total area;the gravity of different types of remote sensing ecological index has been shifted,and in which A-grade and B-level ecological index has a higher center of gravity offset,2004-2010 offset 37.172 km,31.255 km,2010-2016 offset 15.270 km,18.814 km;in the effect of the remote sensing ecological index,the effect of heat is most significant,the correlation as high as 0.859,the effect of vegetation second,the correlation coefficient 0.799,the action intensity of dry degree 0.707,the effect of humidity the smallest,and the correlation coefficient 0.596.The study find that the ecological is improved in the main mining area in the northwest region of the study area,and the ecological is deteriorated of the southeast residential area,and the ecological high region is far away from human activities,northward transfer,and the region mainly due to terrain and other reasons,the human activity interference relatively small.
引文
[1]刘佳骏,史丹,李宇.中国主要煤炭基地生态环境脆弱度判别与调控对策[J].中国能源,2014,36(7):5-9.LIU Jiajun,SHI Dan,LI Yu.Judging and regulating countermeasures of ecological environment vulnerability of major coal bases in China[J].China Energy,2014,36(7):5-9.
    [2]张海娜,乔华.煤炭资源型城市生态环境问题研究及对策探讨[J].经济研究导刊,2013(29):63-64.ZHANG Haina,QIAO Hua.Research and countermeasures on ecological environment problems of coal resource type cities[J].Economic Research Guide,2013(29):63-64.
    [3]贾媛,曹玲娴.煤炭矿区生态风险评价方法研究[J].环境科学与管理,2011,36(4):177-182.JIA Yuan,CAO Lingxian.Review on ecological risk assessment method for coal-mining area[J].Environment Science and Management,2011,36(4):177-182.
    [4]万伦来,刘福,郭文慧.煤炭开采对生态系统功能的胁迫作用:模型·实证[J].环境科学研究,2016,29(6):916-924.WAN Lunlai,LIU Fu,GUO Wenhui.Stress of coal mining on ecosystem functions:model and demonstration[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2016,29(6):916-924.
    [5]张思锋,张立,张一恒.基于生态梯度风险评价方法的榆林煤炭开采区生态风险评价[J].资源科学,2011,33(10):1914-1923.ZHANG Sifeng,ZHANG Li,ZHANG Yiheng.Ecological risk assessment of the Yulin coal mining area based on the PETAR method[J].Resources Science,2011,33(10):1914-1923.
    [6]路苹.煤炭矿区生态环境状况评价定量研究[J].中国矿业,2008,17(7):43-47.LU Ping.The quantitative study on the coal mining area ecological environment state evaluation[J].China Mining Magazine,2008,17(7):43-47.
    [7]王广成,李鹏飞.煤炭矿区复合生态系统及其耦合机理研究[J].生态经济,2014,30(2):139-142.WANG Guangcheng,LI Pengfei.Study on the integrated ecosystem in coal mining area and its coupling mechanism[J].Ecological Economy,2014,30(2):139-142.
    [8]吴钢,魏东,周政达,等.我国大型煤炭基地建设的生态恢复技术研究综述[J].生态学报,2014,34(11):2812-2820.WU Gang,WEI Dong,Zhou Zhengda,et al.A summary of study on ecological restoration technology of large coal bases construction in China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2014,34(11):2812-2820.
    [9]吴志杰,王猛猛,陈绍杰,等.基于遥感生态指数的永定矿区生态变化监测与评价[J].生态科学,2016,35(5):200-207.WU Zhijie,WANG Mengmeng,CHEN Shaojie,et al.Monitoring and evaluation of ecological environment's spatiotemporal variation in mine based on RSEI in Yongding mine[J].Ecological Science,2016,35(5):200-207.
    [10]宋慧敏,薛亮.基于遥感生态指数模型的渭南市生态环境质量动态监测与分析[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(12):3913-3919.SONG Huimin,XUE Liang.Dynamic monitoring and analysis of ecological environment in Weinan city,Northwest China based on RSEI model[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2016,27(12):3913-3919.
    [11]徐涵秋.城市遥感生态指数的创建及其应用[J].生态学报,2013,33(24):7853-7862.XU Hanqiu.A remote sensing urban ecological index and its application[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(24):7853-7862.
    [12]罗春,刘辉,戚陆越.基于遥感指数的生态变化评估——以常宁市为例[J].国土资源遥感,2014,26(4):145-150.LUO Chun,LIU Hui,QI Luyue.Ecological changes assessment based on remote sensing indices:a case study of Changning city[J].Remote Sensing for Land and Resources,2014,26(4):145-150.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700