旅游企业主导的弥勒可邑传统村落景观建设
|
摘要
在乡村振兴战略目标的推动下,传统村落景观建设迎来了新的机遇与挑战,可邑村景区的建设与运营为村落景观研究提供了本土乡村建设案例。结合弥勒可邑村传统村落景观建设实例,分析旅游企业介入后可邑村落景观的变化,探讨旅游企业对村落景观生产的作用机制。结果表明:旅游企业带来的资金和技术支持,使村落景观改造被纳入科学合理的规划建设范畴,为传统村落景观生产提供了物质基础;旅游企业在对民族文化的挖掘与保护的同时迎合了旅游市场需求,融合了当地景观元素的商业景观,使村落景观由物质转向资本,成为获得利润资本的场所。
Promoted by the strategy of rural revitalization, the construction of traditional village landscape ushered in new opportunities and challenges, the construction and operation of Keyi Village provides local cases for the study of village landscape. Combined with the landscape construction of traditional village in Keyi Village, Mile City, this paper analyses the changes of village landscape after the intervention of tourism enterprises, and explores the mechanism of the role of tourism enterprises in village landscape construction. The findings indicated that the involvement of tourism enterprises has brought financial and technical support to traditional villages, which has brought village landscape into scientific and rational planning and construction, and it provides a material basis for the landscape construction of traditional village; While protecting national culture, tourism enterprises cater to the demand of tourism market, they have built new commercial landscape which integrates local landscape elements, =so that the village landscape is turned from material to capital, and becomes a place where enterprises can obtain profit capital.
Promoted by the strategy of rural revitalization, the construction of traditional village landscape ushered in new opportunities and challenges, the construction and operation of Keyi Village provides local cases for the study of village landscape. Combined with the landscape construction of traditional village in Keyi Village, Mile City, this paper analyses the changes of village landscape after the intervention of tourism enterprises, and explores the mechanism of the role of tourism enterprises in village landscape construction. The findings indicated that the involvement of tourism enterprises has brought financial and technical support to traditional villages, which has brought village landscape into scientific and rational planning and construction, and it provides a material basis for the landscape construction of traditional village; While protecting national culture, tourism enterprises cater to the demand of tourism market, they have built new commercial landscape which integrates local landscape elements, =so that the village landscape is turned from material to capital, and becomes a place where enterprises can obtain profit capital.
引文
[1] 王铁梅.企业主导下的村庄再造[D].太原:山西大学,2017.
[2] 朱海英.企业参与乡村旅游扶贫的影响机制研究[J].商学研究,2018,25(1):97-105.
[3] 刘春春.企业在乡村振兴中的作用研究:基于J省X村的实证调查[J].中国商论,2018,771(32):174-175.
[4] 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局.马克思恩格斯选集第一卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2012.
[5] Swyngedouw E.The Production of Space[J].Economic Geography,1992,68(3):317-319.
[6] 杨启.基于空间生产理论的成都文化消费空间研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2016.
[7] 居伊·德波.景观社会[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2007.
[8] Markus T A.Fields of Vision:Landscape Imagery and National Identity in England and the United States,Stephen Daniels Polity Press,Cambridge,MA (1993),257 pp.75 figures.￡39.50,0 746 0450 1[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,1993,13(4):373-375.
[9] Skillington T.The City as Text:Constructing Dublin\”s Identity Through Discourse on Transportation and Urban Re-Development in the Press[J].The British Journal of Sociology,1998,49(3):456-473.
[10] Abu-Khafajah S,Rabady R A.THE “JORDANIAN” ROMAN COMPLEX:Reinventing Urban Landscape to Accommodate Globalization[J].Near Eastern Archaeology,2013,76(3):186-192.
[11] 卫丽姣,王朝辉,崔春于.商业化背景下古村落旅游景观生产:以安徽宏村为例[J].热带地理,2018,38(6):148-157.
[12] 王永健.后工业社会城市艺术区的景观生产:景德镇陶溪川个案[J].民族艺术,2019(2):139-146.
[13] 戴林琳,徐洪涛.京郊历史文化村落公共空间的形成动因、体系构成及发展变迁[J].北京规划建设,2010(3):74-78.
[14] 王丹.基于空间生产理论的古村落文化景观研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2016.
[15] 赵敏.旅游挤出效应下的丽江古城文化景观生产研究[D].昆明:云南大学,2015.
[16] 刘文彬,曹宗峰.传统旅游企业现代转型的实现路径研究[J].财经界 (学术版),2014(20):45-45.
[2] 朱海英.企业参与乡村旅游扶贫的影响机制研究[J].商学研究,2018,25(1):97-105.
[3] 刘春春.企业在乡村振兴中的作用研究:基于J省X村的实证调查[J].中国商论,2018,771(32):174-175.
[4] 中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局.马克思恩格斯选集第一卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2012.
[5] Swyngedouw E.The Production of Space[J].Economic Geography,1992,68(3):317-319.
[6] 杨启.基于空间生产理论的成都文化消费空间研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2016.
[7] 居伊·德波.景观社会[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2007.
[8] Markus T A.Fields of Vision:Landscape Imagery and National Identity in England and the United States,Stephen Daniels Polity Press,Cambridge,MA (1993),257 pp.75 figures.￡39.50,0 746 0450 1[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,1993,13(4):373-375.
[9] Skillington T.The City as Text:Constructing Dublin\”s Identity Through Discourse on Transportation and Urban Re-Development in the Press[J].The British Journal of Sociology,1998,49(3):456-473.
[10] Abu-Khafajah S,Rabady R A.THE “JORDANIAN” ROMAN COMPLEX:Reinventing Urban Landscape to Accommodate Globalization[J].Near Eastern Archaeology,2013,76(3):186-192.
[11] 卫丽姣,王朝辉,崔春于.商业化背景下古村落旅游景观生产:以安徽宏村为例[J].热带地理,2018,38(6):148-157.
[12] 王永健.后工业社会城市艺术区的景观生产:景德镇陶溪川个案[J].民族艺术,2019(2):139-146.
[13] 戴林琳,徐洪涛.京郊历史文化村落公共空间的形成动因、体系构成及发展变迁[J].北京规划建设,2010(3):74-78.
[14] 王丹.基于空间生产理论的古村落文化景观研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2016.
[15] 赵敏.旅游挤出效应下的丽江古城文化景观生产研究[D].昆明:云南大学,2015.
[16] 刘文彬,曹宗峰.传统旅游企业现代转型的实现路径研究[J].财经界 (学术版),2014(20):45-45.