生态认知对流域居民生态补偿参与意愿的影响研究——基于大汶河的调查数据
|
摘要
流域居民参与生态补偿的积极性和主动性是相关生态补偿政策得以顺利推进的重要保障。流域居民是否参与生态补偿的行为决策是基于其生态认知衡量后在理性和感性综合影响下所作出的最佳选择,其生态补偿参与意愿不仅受客观现实条件的制约,还受在特定社会文化环境下所形成的生态认知水平的影响。因此,分析生态认知对流域居民生态补偿参与意愿的影响,对促进流域生态补偿政策的有效实施和流域生态环境质量的不断改善具有重要意义。本文基于条件价值评估法所获得的针对大汶河流域居民的1 020份问卷资料,以计划行为理论为指导,利用结构方程模型探讨生态认知对流域居民生态补偿参与意愿的影响及作用机理。研究结果表明:①生态认知对流域居民的生态补偿参与意愿具有显著促进作用,即生态认知水平越高,参与流域生态补偿的意愿越强烈。②行为态度、主观规范和知觉行为控制两两相互正相关影响,且都对生态补偿参与意愿有显著正向影响,其中知觉行为控制的影响最为显著。③流域居民的行为态度受其对目前水量和水质的满意度及对保护生态与发展经济的重要性比较认知的影响较大。④指令性规范对流域居民所产生的带动示范作用大于示范性规范。⑤流域居民是否参与生态补偿的知觉行为控制主要受流域生态对其生产生活的影响程度及水环境产权意识的影响。为此,应充分发挥新闻媒体的舆论导向作用,加大对流域生态环境的治理力度,不断完善流域生态补偿的监督管理体系,以提升流域居民的生态认知水平,进而提高流域居民的生态补偿参与意愿。
The enthusiasm and initiative of river basin residents to participate in ecological compensation is an important guarantee for the full play of ecological compensation effect. Whether the residents of the river basin participate in the behavior decision of ecological compensation is based on the best choice made under the comprehensive influence of rationality and sensibility after the measurement of ecological cognition,and their willingness is not only restricted by objective reality,but also influenced by the level of ecological cognition formed under the specific social and cultural environment. Therefore,it is of great significance to analyze the influence of ecological cognition on the willingness of ecological compensation participation of river basin residents in promoting the effective implementation of ecological compensation policy in river basin and the continuous improvement of ecological environment quality in river basin. Based on the 1 020 questionnaires obtained from the field investigation of the Dawen River Basin used by CVM,and directed by TPB,this paper applies structural equation model to verify the influence of ecological cognition on river basin residents' willingness to participate in ecological compensation and its mechanism. The main findings showed as follows: ①River basin residents' ecological cognition significantly promotes their willingness to participate in ecological compensation. ②Attitudes toward the behavior( BA),subject norm( SN) and perceived behavior control( PBC) present mutual positive influences among each other,and all have significant positive influences on their participation willingness in ecological compensation,of which that of PBC is the most typical.③The BA of the residents is more influenced by their satisfaction with the current water quantity and quality and the comparative cognition of the importance of protecting ecology and developing economy. ④The exemplary effect of the prescriptive norm on the river basin residents is greater than that of the demonstration norm. ⑤Whether to participate in the PBC of ecological compensation in river basin is mainly affected by the influence degree of watershed ecology on residents' production and life and the awareness of water environmental property rights. Relevant suggestions are finally put forward based on the conclusion: we should give full play to the public opinion guidance role of the news media,increase the control of the ecological environment of the river basin and improve the supervision and management system of the ecological compensation of the river basin,so as to improve the ecological cognition level of the river basin residents,and then enhance the willingness to participate in ecological compensation.
The enthusiasm and initiative of river basin residents to participate in ecological compensation is an important guarantee for the full play of ecological compensation effect. Whether the residents of the river basin participate in the behavior decision of ecological compensation is based on the best choice made under the comprehensive influence of rationality and sensibility after the measurement of ecological cognition,and their willingness is not only restricted by objective reality,but also influenced by the level of ecological cognition formed under the specific social and cultural environment. Therefore,it is of great significance to analyze the influence of ecological cognition on the willingness of ecological compensation participation of river basin residents in promoting the effective implementation of ecological compensation policy in river basin and the continuous improvement of ecological environment quality in river basin. Based on the 1 020 questionnaires obtained from the field investigation of the Dawen River Basin used by CVM,and directed by TPB,this paper applies structural equation model to verify the influence of ecological cognition on river basin residents' willingness to participate in ecological compensation and its mechanism. The main findings showed as follows: ①River basin residents' ecological cognition significantly promotes their willingness to participate in ecological compensation. ②Attitudes toward the behavior( BA),subject norm( SN) and perceived behavior control( PBC) present mutual positive influences among each other,and all have significant positive influences on their participation willingness in ecological compensation,of which that of PBC is the most typical.③The BA of the residents is more influenced by their satisfaction with the current water quantity and quality and the comparative cognition of the importance of protecting ecology and developing economy. ④The exemplary effect of the prescriptive norm on the river basin residents is greater than that of the demonstration norm. ⑤Whether to participate in the PBC of ecological compensation in river basin is mainly affected by the influence degree of watershed ecology on residents' production and life and the awareness of water environmental property rights. Relevant suggestions are finally put forward based on the conclusion: we should give full play to the public opinion guidance role of the news media,increase the control of the ecological environment of the river basin and improve the supervision and management system of the ecological compensation of the river basin,so as to improve the ecological cognition level of the river basin residents,and then enhance the willingness to participate in ecological compensation.
引文
[1]郭志建，葛颜祥，范芳玉．基于水质和水量的流域逐级补偿制度研究---以大汶河流域为例[J]．中国农业资源与区划，2013,34(1):96-102．
[2]田玲玲，曾菊新，董莹，等．汉江流域经济区与主体功能区布局的协同发展研究[J]．华中师范大学学报(自然科学版)，2016,50(3):435-442．
[3]KOLLMUSS A,AGYEMAN J.Mind the gap:why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?[J].Environmental education research,2002,8(3):239-260．
[4]TORRES A B,MACMILLAN D C,SKUTSCH M,et al.Payments for ecosystem services and rural development:Landowners’preferences and potential participation in western Mexico[J].Ecosystem services,2013,3(6):72-81．
[5]李玉新，魏同洋，靳乐山．牧民对草原生态补偿政策评价及其影响因素研究---以内蒙古四子王旗为例[J]．资源科学，2014,36(11):2442-2450．
[6]李皓，张克斌，杨晓晖，等．密云水库流域“稻改旱”生态补偿农户参与意愿分析[J]．生态学报，2017,37(20):6953-6962．
[7]SOUTHGATE D,WUNDER S.Paying for watershed services in Latin America:a review of current initiatives[J].Journal of sustainable forestry,2009,28(3):497-524．
[8]谢花林，程玲娟．地下水漏斗区农户冬小麦休耕意愿的影响因素及其生态补偿标准研究---以河北衡水为例[J]．自然资源学报，2017,32(12):2012-2022．
[9]杨美玲，朱志玲，任凯丽．限制开发生态区农户生态补偿参与意愿及其影响因素---以宁夏盐池县为例[J]．干旱区地理，2018,41(3):634-642．
[10]葛颜祥，梁丽娟，王蓓蓓，等．黄河流域居民生态补偿意愿及支付水平分析---以山东省为例[J]．中国农村经济，2009(10):77-85．
[11]接玉梅，葛颜祥，徐光丽．黄河下游居民生态补偿认知程度及支付意愿分析---基于对山东省的问卷调查[J]．农业经济问题，2011,32(8):95-101．
[12]MUDACA J D,TSUCHIYA T,YAMADA M,et al.Household participation in payments for ecosystem services:a case study from Mozambique[J].Forest policy and economics,2015,55:21-27．
[13]熊凯，孔凡斌，陈胜东．鄱阳湖湿地农户生态补偿受偿意愿及其影响因素分析---基于CVM和排序Logistic模型的实证[J]．江西财经大学学报，2016(1):28-35．
[14]张方圆，赵雪雁，田亚彪，等．社会资本对农户生态补偿参与意愿的影响---以甘肃省张掖市、甘南藏族自治州、临夏回族自治州为例[J]．资源科学，2013,35(9):1821-1827．
[15]BREMER L L,FARLEY K A,LOPEZ-CARR D.What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs?an evaluation of Ecuador’s Socio Páramo program[J].Land use policy,2014,36:122-133．
[16]赵雪雁，路慧玲，刘霜，等．甘南黄河水源补给区生态补偿农户参与意愿分析[J]．中国人口·资源与环境，2012,22(4):96-101．
[17]张文彬，李国平．生态补偿、心理因素与居民生态保护意愿和行为研究---以秦巴生态功能区为例[J]．资源科学，2017,39(5):881-892．
[18]余亮亮，蔡银莺．生态功能区域农田生态补偿的农户受偿意愿分析---以湖北省麻城市为例[J]．经济地理，2015,35(1):134-140．
[19]周晨，李国平．流域生态补偿的支付意愿及影响因素---以南水北调中线工程受水区郑州市为例[J]．经济地理，2015,35(6):38-46．
[20]史恒通，睢党臣，徐涛，等．生态价值认知对农民流域生态治理参与意愿的影响---以陕西省渭河流域为例[J]．中国农村观察，2017(2):68-80．
[21]魏玲，望晓东．耕地生态服务价值认知与支付意愿调查分析---以武汉市为例[J]．农业经济，2014(1):85-87．
[22]JORESKOG K G.Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis[J].Psychometrika,1967,32(4):443-482．
[23]王卫东．结构方程模型及其应用[M]．北京:中国人民大学出版社，2010．
[24]宾幕容，文孔亮，周发明．湖区农户畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用意愿和行为分析---以洞庭湖生态经济区为例[J]．经济地理，2017,37(9):185-191．
[25]甘臣林，陈璐，陈银蓉，等．基于农户满意度的农地转出绩效影响因素分析---以武汉、鄂州两地典型调查样本为例[J]．资源科学，2018,40(11):2225-2235.
[2]田玲玲，曾菊新，董莹，等．汉江流域经济区与主体功能区布局的协同发展研究[J]．华中师范大学学报(自然科学版)，2016,50(3):435-442．
[3]KOLLMUSS A,AGYEMAN J.Mind the gap:why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?[J].Environmental education research,2002,8(3):239-260．
[4]TORRES A B,MACMILLAN D C,SKUTSCH M,et al.Payments for ecosystem services and rural development:Landowners’preferences and potential participation in western Mexico[J].Ecosystem services,2013,3(6):72-81．
[5]李玉新，魏同洋，靳乐山．牧民对草原生态补偿政策评价及其影响因素研究---以内蒙古四子王旗为例[J]．资源科学，2014,36(11):2442-2450．
[6]李皓，张克斌，杨晓晖，等．密云水库流域“稻改旱”生态补偿农户参与意愿分析[J]．生态学报，2017,37(20):6953-6962．
[7]SOUTHGATE D,WUNDER S.Paying for watershed services in Latin America:a review of current initiatives[J].Journal of sustainable forestry,2009,28(3):497-524．
[8]谢花林，程玲娟．地下水漏斗区农户冬小麦休耕意愿的影响因素及其生态补偿标准研究---以河北衡水为例[J]．自然资源学报，2017,32(12):2012-2022．
[9]杨美玲，朱志玲，任凯丽．限制开发生态区农户生态补偿参与意愿及其影响因素---以宁夏盐池县为例[J]．干旱区地理，2018,41(3):634-642．
[10]葛颜祥，梁丽娟，王蓓蓓，等．黄河流域居民生态补偿意愿及支付水平分析---以山东省为例[J]．中国农村经济，2009(10):77-85．
[11]接玉梅，葛颜祥，徐光丽．黄河下游居民生态补偿认知程度及支付意愿分析---基于对山东省的问卷调查[J]．农业经济问题，2011,32(8):95-101．
[12]MUDACA J D,TSUCHIYA T,YAMADA M,et al.Household participation in payments for ecosystem services:a case study from Mozambique[J].Forest policy and economics,2015,55:21-27．
[13]熊凯，孔凡斌，陈胜东．鄱阳湖湿地农户生态补偿受偿意愿及其影响因素分析---基于CVM和排序Logistic模型的实证[J]．江西财经大学学报，2016(1):28-35．
[14]张方圆，赵雪雁，田亚彪，等．社会资本对农户生态补偿参与意愿的影响---以甘肃省张掖市、甘南藏族自治州、临夏回族自治州为例[J]．资源科学，2013,35(9):1821-1827．
[15]BREMER L L,FARLEY K A,LOPEZ-CARR D.What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs?an evaluation of Ecuador’s Socio Páramo program[J].Land use policy,2014,36:122-133．
[16]赵雪雁，路慧玲，刘霜，等．甘南黄河水源补给区生态补偿农户参与意愿分析[J]．中国人口·资源与环境，2012,22(4):96-101．
[17]张文彬，李国平．生态补偿、心理因素与居民生态保护意愿和行为研究---以秦巴生态功能区为例[J]．资源科学，2017,39(5):881-892．
[18]余亮亮，蔡银莺．生态功能区域农田生态补偿的农户受偿意愿分析---以湖北省麻城市为例[J]．经济地理，2015,35(1):134-140．
[19]周晨，李国平．流域生态补偿的支付意愿及影响因素---以南水北调中线工程受水区郑州市为例[J]．经济地理，2015,35(6):38-46．
[20]史恒通，睢党臣，徐涛，等．生态价值认知对农民流域生态治理参与意愿的影响---以陕西省渭河流域为例[J]．中国农村观察，2017(2):68-80．
[21]魏玲，望晓东．耕地生态服务价值认知与支付意愿调查分析---以武汉市为例[J]．农业经济，2014(1):85-87．
[22]JORESKOG K G.Some contributions to maximum likelihood factor analysis[J].Psychometrika,1967,32(4):443-482．
[23]王卫东．结构方程模型及其应用[M]．北京:中国人民大学出版社，2010．
[24]宾幕容，文孔亮，周发明．湖区农户畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用意愿和行为分析---以洞庭湖生态经济区为例[J]．经济地理，2017,37(9):185-191．
[25]甘臣林，陈璐，陈银蓉，等．基于农户满意度的农地转出绩效影响因素分析---以武汉、鄂州两地典型调查样本为例[J]．资源科学，2018,40(11):2225-2235.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |