熵权法在地下水环境质量评价中的局限性

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Disadvantages of entropy weighting model in the groundwater quality evaluation 作者：闫峰 ; 张兴磊 ; 唐贝 ; 肖程之 英文作者：YAN Feng;ZHANG XingLei;TANG Bei;XIAO Chengzhi;School of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Nanchang University; 关键词：地下水环境质量评价 ; 熵权法 ; 权重失真 英文关键词：groundwater quality evaluation;;entropy weighting model;;weights distortion 中文刊名：南昌大学学报(工科版) 英文刊名：Journal of Nanchang University(Engineering & Technology) 机构：南昌大学建筑工程学院; 出版日期：2019-03-28 出版单位：南昌大学学报(工科版) 年：2019 期：01 基金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(51709142) 语种：中文; 页：15-18 页数：4 CN：36-1194/T ISSN：1006-0456 分类号：X824

摘要

以西北某镇的浅层地下水水质评价为例,揭示了熵权法的2项不足:熵权法仅仅考虑了指标统计意义的重要性,而没有考虑它们在水资源管理中的实际意义,这可能导致污染严重的指标权重过小;熵权法在标准化结果中具有失真现象,可能导致污染较轻的指标权重过大。这2个缺点会使得综合评价结果过于乐观,因此熵权法求得的权重不能直接用于地下水水质评价。进行综合评价之前,应当首先对熵权法求得的权重参数进行合理性分析。
        This study takes the groundwater quality evaluation in a northwest town as an illustration to reveal two disadvantages of the entropy weighting model.Entropy weighting model only takes the statistical significance of the indicators into consideration,but neglects their practical meaning in the groundwater quality assessment,which may reduce the weights of heavily polluted indicators. Entropy weighting model has distortion phenomenon in the standardization results,which may enlarge the weights of clean indicators.These two disadvantages make the evaluation result over-optimistic. Therefore,the weights parameters generated by entropy weighting model cannot directly used in the groundwater quality evaluation without reasonableness analysis.

引文

[1] ISLAM A,AHMED N,BODRUDDOZA M,et al.Characterizing groundwater quality ranks for drinking purposes in Sylhet district,Bangladesh,using entropy method,spatial autocorrelation index,and geostatistics[J]. Environmental science and pollution research,2017(2):1-25.
    [2] GORGIJ A D,KISI O,MOGHADDAM A A,et al.Groundwater quality ranking for drinking purposes,using the entropy method and the spatial autocorrelation index[J].Environmental earth sciences,2017,76(7):269-271.
    [3]邹志红,孙靖南,任广平.模糊评价因子的熵权法赋权及其在水质评价中的应用[J].环境科学学报,2005,25(4):552-556.
    [4]李文宾,姚阿漫.基于熵权的五元联系数在地下水水质评价中的应用[J].水资源与水工程学报,2013,24(2):118-120.
    [5]谢非,张永祥,任仲宇,等.改进的模糊综合评价法在地下水水质评价中的应用[J].水资源与水工程学报,2014(3):125-128.
    [6]彭兆亮,何斌,彭勇,等.基于熵权的可变模糊模型在地下水质评价中的应用[J].水资源与水工程学报,2010,21(4):6-10.
    [7]马骁,张永祥,王昊.改进的尼梅罗污染指数法在地下水水质评价中的应用[J].环境工程,2017(3):158-162.
    [8] YAN F,LIU L,LI Y,et al.A dynamic water quality index model based on functional data analysis[J].Ecological indicators,2015,57:249-258.
    [9]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检疫总局.地下水质量标准:GB/T 14848—2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017.