生态城市发展质量评价方法研究
|
摘要
本文针对生态城市发展质量评价问题,提出一种以DPSIR为指标构建指导框架与犹豫模糊EDAS方法为核心的综合评价体系。首先,在DPSIR概念框架下,通过对指标间因果联系及反馈机制的分析,建立一套生态城市发展质量指标体系。其次,根据评价框架维度间存在相互冲突且指标间相互影响问题,提出一种犹豫模糊EDAS-CRITIC评价模型,该方法通过待评城市与参评城市平均水平的正负差距体现决策者对待评城市偏好程度。最后,以云南省4个典型城市为例进行算法验证及结果分析,且通过对比分析得知该方法评价结果的合理性和科学性较好。结果表明:昆明市能在确保经济发展的前提下充分利用生态旅游资源,成为云南省内生态质量发展较好的城市。研究证实,本文所提出的综合评价体系不仅评价过程简单明确,且评价结果客观丰富。
Aiming at resolving the problem of eco-city development quality evaluation,this paper proposes a comprehensive evaluation system with DPSIR as the index construction framework and hesitant fuzzy EDA method as the core. Firstly,under the framework of DPSIR concept,through the analysis of causal link and feedback mechanism between indicators,a set of eco-city development quality index system was established. Secondly,according to the conflicting dimensions between evaluation frameworks and the mutual influence of indicators,a hesitant fuzzy EDAS-CRITIC evaluation model is proposed,which reflects the decision makers to evaluate cities by the positive and negative gap between the average city to be evaluated and the participating cities. Finally,the algorithm verification and results analysis are carried out in four typical cities of Yunnan province. The comparative analysis shows that the evaluation results of this method are reasonable and scientific. The results show that Kunming city can make full use of ecotourism resources under the premise of ensuring economic development and become a city with better ecological quality development in Yunnan province. The research confirms that the comprehensive evaluation system proposed in this paper not only has a simple and clear evaluation process,but also has objective and rich evaluation results.
Aiming at resolving the problem of eco-city development quality evaluation,this paper proposes a comprehensive evaluation system with DPSIR as the index construction framework and hesitant fuzzy EDA method as the core. Firstly,under the framework of DPSIR concept,through the analysis of causal link and feedback mechanism between indicators,a set of eco-city development quality index system was established. Secondly,according to the conflicting dimensions between evaluation frameworks and the mutual influence of indicators,a hesitant fuzzy EDAS-CRITIC evaluation model is proposed,which reflects the decision makers to evaluate cities by the positive and negative gap between the average city to be evaluated and the participating cities. Finally,the algorithm verification and results analysis are carried out in four typical cities of Yunnan province. The comparative analysis shows that the evaluation results of this method are reasonable and scientific. The results show that Kunming city can make full use of ecotourism resources under the premise of ensuring economic development and become a city with better ecological quality development in Yunnan province. The research confirms that the comprehensive evaluation system proposed in this paper not only has a simple and clear evaluation process,but also has objective and rich evaluation results.
引文
[1]柳映潇,王衡.基于物元可拓模型和ARIMA模型的生态城市建设评价研究[J].生态经济,2018,34(7):154-161.
[2]翁翎燕,张超,李伟霄.基于全排列多边形图示法的生态城市评价——以上海市为例[J].地球与环境,2017,45(3):356-362.
[3]TANG C,WU X,ZHENG Q,et al. Ecological security evaluations of the tourism industry in ecological conservation development areas:A case study of Beijing's ECDA[J].Journal of cleaner production,2018,197,999-1010.
[4]PIWOWARSKI M,MILASZEWICZ D,LATUSZYNSKA M,et al. TOPSIS and VIKOR methods in study of sustainable development in the EU countries[J].Procedia computer science,2018,126:1683-1692.
[5]KESHAVARZ G M,ZAVADSKA E K,OLFAT L,et al. Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution(EDAS)[J].Informatical,2015,26(3):435-451.
[6]KARASAN A,KAHRAMAN C. A novel interval-valued neutrosophic EDAS method:Prioritization of the United Nations national sustainable development goals[J].Soft computing,2018(1):1-16.
[7]GHORABAEE M K,AMIRI M,ZAVADSKA E K,et al. Multi-criteria group decision-making using an extended EDAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets[J].E+M ekonomie a management,2017,20(1):48-68.
[8]BURKHARD B,MULLER F. Drivers-pressure-state-impact-response[J].Ecological indicators,2008,5(2):967-670.
[9]PACHECOA A,CARRASCOA A R,VILA-CONCEJOA A,et al. A coastal management program for channels located in back barrier systems[J].Ocean&coastal management,2006(9):119-123.
[10]ANGEL B,GALPARSORO I,SOLAUN O,et al. The European water framework directive and the DPSIR,a methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good ecological status[J].Estuarine coastal&shelf science,2006,66(1):84-96.
[11]秦伟山,张义丰,袁境.生态文明城市评价指标体系与水平测度[J].资源科学,2013,35(8):1677-1684.
[12]罗辉,罗淳,黄晓园.生态文明建设评价方法研究——以昆明市为例[J].生态经济,2014,30(5):68-72.
[13]李从琳,李国柱.省域生态文明建设综合评价研究[J].生态经济,2017,33(10):210-213.
[14]甘彩云,施生旭.基于“五位一体”的厦门城市生态文明建设及对策分析[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2017,11(2):7-11
[15]RAPPORT D,SINGH A. An ecohealth-based framework for state of environment reporting[J].Ecological indicators,2006,6(2):409-428.
[16]ZADEH L A. Fuzzy sets[J].Information and control,1965,8(3):338-356.
[17]TURSEN I. Interval valued fuzzy sets based on normal forms[J].Fuzzy sets and systems,1986,20(2):191-210.
[18]ATANASSOV K. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy sets and systems,1986,20(1):87-96.
[19]ATANSSOV K,GARGOV G. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy sets and systems,1989,3(1):343-349.
[20]TORRA V,NARUKAWA Y. On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision[C].The 18th IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems.
[21]TORRA V. Hesitant fuzzy sets[J].International journal of intelligent systems,2010,25:529-539.
[22]WANG Y J,LEE H S. Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making[J].Computers&mathematics with applications,2007,53(11):1762-1772.
[23]MARDANI A,ZAVADSKAS E K,GOVINDAN K,et al. Vikor technique:a systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and applications[J].Sustainability,2016,8(37):1-38.
[24]DIAKOULAKI D,MAVROTAS G,PAPAYANNAKIS L. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems:The critic method[J].Computers&operations research,1995,22(7):763-770.
[25]XU Z,ZHANG X. Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information[J].Knowledge-based systems,2013,52(5):53-64.
[26]HUCHANG L,ZESHUI X,MEIMEI X. Multiplicative consistency of hesitant fuzzy preference relation and its application in group decision making[J].International journal of information technology&decision making,2014,13(1):47-76.
[2]翁翎燕,张超,李伟霄.基于全排列多边形图示法的生态城市评价——以上海市为例[J].地球与环境,2017,45(3):356-362.
[3]TANG C,WU X,ZHENG Q,et al. Ecological security evaluations of the tourism industry in ecological conservation development areas:A case study of Beijing's ECDA[J].Journal of cleaner production,2018,197,999-1010.
[4]PIWOWARSKI M,MILASZEWICZ D,LATUSZYNSKA M,et al. TOPSIS and VIKOR methods in study of sustainable development in the EU countries[J].Procedia computer science,2018,126:1683-1692.
[5]KESHAVARZ G M,ZAVADSKA E K,OLFAT L,et al. Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution(EDAS)[J].Informatical,2015,26(3):435-451.
[6]KARASAN A,KAHRAMAN C. A novel interval-valued neutrosophic EDAS method:Prioritization of the United Nations national sustainable development goals[J].Soft computing,2018(1):1-16.
[7]GHORABAEE M K,AMIRI M,ZAVADSKA E K,et al. Multi-criteria group decision-making using an extended EDAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets[J].E+M ekonomie a management,2017,20(1):48-68.
[8]BURKHARD B,MULLER F. Drivers-pressure-state-impact-response[J].Ecological indicators,2008,5(2):967-670.
[9]PACHECOA A,CARRASCOA A R,VILA-CONCEJOA A,et al. A coastal management program for channels located in back barrier systems[J].Ocean&coastal management,2006(9):119-123.
[10]ANGEL B,GALPARSORO I,SOLAUN O,et al. The European water framework directive and the DPSIR,a methodological approach to assess the risk of failing to achieve good ecological status[J].Estuarine coastal&shelf science,2006,66(1):84-96.
[11]秦伟山,张义丰,袁境.生态文明城市评价指标体系与水平测度[J].资源科学,2013,35(8):1677-1684.
[12]罗辉,罗淳,黄晓园.生态文明建设评价方法研究——以昆明市为例[J].生态经济,2014,30(5):68-72.
[13]李从琳,李国柱.省域生态文明建设综合评价研究[J].生态经济,2017,33(10):210-213.
[14]甘彩云,施生旭.基于“五位一体”的厦门城市生态文明建设及对策分析[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2017,11(2):7-11
[15]RAPPORT D,SINGH A. An ecohealth-based framework for state of environment reporting[J].Ecological indicators,2006,6(2):409-428.
[16]ZADEH L A. Fuzzy sets[J].Information and control,1965,8(3):338-356.
[17]TURSEN I. Interval valued fuzzy sets based on normal forms[J].Fuzzy sets and systems,1986,20(2):191-210.
[18]ATANASSOV K. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy sets and systems,1986,20(1):87-96.
[19]ATANSSOV K,GARGOV G. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy sets and systems,1989,3(1):343-349.
[20]TORRA V,NARUKAWA Y. On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision[C].The 18th IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems.
[21]TORRA V. Hesitant fuzzy sets[J].International journal of intelligent systems,2010,25:529-539.
[22]WANG Y J,LEE H S. Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making[J].Computers&mathematics with applications,2007,53(11):1762-1772.
[23]MARDANI A,ZAVADSKAS E K,GOVINDAN K,et al. Vikor technique:a systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and applications[J].Sustainability,2016,8(37):1-38.
[24]DIAKOULAKI D,MAVROTAS G,PAPAYANNAKIS L. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems:The critic method[J].Computers&operations research,1995,22(7):763-770.
[25]XU Z,ZHANG X. Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information[J].Knowledge-based systems,2013,52(5):53-64.
[26]HUCHANG L,ZESHUI X,MEIMEI X. Multiplicative consistency of hesitant fuzzy preference relation and its application in group decision making[J].International journal of information technology&decision making,2014,13(1):47-76.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |