淮河中上游浮游植物群落结构特征及营养状况评价
|
摘要
浮游植物的密度和种群组成可以用来评价水体的富营养化状况,是评价水体富营养化的重要参数。但是,目前淮河流域水体富营养化评价较少,缺乏利用河流浮游植物评价河流富营养化程度方面的研究。从2012年12月开始对淮河中上游10个生态监测断面进行现场调查,获取浮游植物种类、密度及水体理化指标数据;利用浮游植物指示生物法、丰度评价法和综合营养状态指数法综合分析水体富营养化状况。结果表明,研究期间硅藻门和绿藻门占据优势地位;各监测断面具有不同的优势物种,且以硅藻门和绿藻门物种为主;总体上沙颍河中下游水体富营养化程度大于沙颍河上游及淮河干流。
The phytoplankton community structure is an important parameter for water eutrophication evaluation, and its density and species composition can be used to evaluate the water eutrophication. However, there is less eutrophication evaluation, and less study on the river eutrophication by phytoplankton in the Huaihe River. December 2012, July 2013, December 2013, and July and December 2014. 5 field experiments are carried out on 10 ecological monitoring sections in the upper and middle reaches of Huaihe River, and phytoplankton species, density and water physicochemical indexes have been got. Eutrophication status are evaluated by phytoplankton indicator biological method, abundance assessment method and comprehensive nutrition state index method. The results show that during the study period, Bacillariophyta and Chlorophyta occupy the dominant position, and the dominant species are different in the different monitoring sections, and Bacillariophyta and Chlorophyta are the dominant species. On the whole, water body eutrophication is greater in the middle and downstream of Shaying River than the monitoring sections of Shaying River upstream and Huai River.
The phytoplankton community structure is an important parameter for water eutrophication evaluation, and its density and species composition can be used to evaluate the water eutrophication. However, there is less eutrophication evaluation, and less study on the river eutrophication by phytoplankton in the Huaihe River. December 2012, July 2013, December 2013, and July and December 2014. 5 field experiments are carried out on 10 ecological monitoring sections in the upper and middle reaches of Huaihe River, and phytoplankton species, density and water physicochemical indexes have been got. Eutrophication status are evaluated by phytoplankton indicator biological method, abundance assessment method and comprehensive nutrition state index method. The results show that during the study period, Bacillariophyta and Chlorophyta occupy the dominant position, and the dominant species are different in the different monitoring sections, and Bacillariophyta and Chlorophyta are the dominant species. On the whole, water body eutrophication is greater in the middle and downstream of Shaying River than the monitoring sections of Shaying River upstream and Huai River.
引文
[1] 张婷,李德亮,许宝红. 西洞庭湖区养殖水体浮游植物调查与水质评价[J]. 水生态学杂志,2009,2(5):12-18.
[2] 贺蓉,蒋礼,郑曙明,等. 三峡库区甘井河水域牧场浮游植物群落结构及水质评价[J]. 水生生物学报,2015,39(5):902-909.
[3] Kamenir Y Z, Dubinsky T Z, Zohary T. Phytoplankton size structure stability in a meso-eutrophic subtropical lake [J]. Hydrobiologia, 2004,520:89-104.
[4] 况其军,马沛明,胡征宇,等. 湖泊富营养化的藻类生物学评价与治理研究进展[J]. 安全与环境学报,2005,5(2):87-91.
[5] Suikkanen S, Laamanen M, Huttunen M. Long-term changes in summer phytoplankton communities of the open northern Baltic Sea [J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2007,71:580-592.
[6] 陶敏,谢碧文,齐泽民,等. 沱江浮游植物群落特征及水质评价[J]. 海洋与湖沼,2016,47(4):854-861.
[7] Aizaki M. Application of modified Carlson’s trophic state index to Japanese lakes and its relationships to other parameters related to trophic state [J]. Res Rep Natl Inst Environ Stud, 1981,(23):13-31.
[8] 朱庆峰,廖秀丽,陈新庚,等. 用灰色聚类法对荔湾湖水质富营养化程度的评价[J]. 中国环境监测,2001,20(2):47-50.
[9] 张思冲,张雪萍,廖永丰. 营养度指数法在寒地湖泊富营养化评价中的应用[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报,2003,(35):416-419.
[10] 谢平,李德,陈广才,等. 基于贝叶斯公式的湖泊富营养化随机评价方法及其验证[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2005,(14):224-228.
[11] 石永强,左其亭,窦明. 小型景观湖泊眉湖水质分析及富营养化评价[J]. 水电能源科学,2016,34(7):32-36.
[12] Zuo Q T, Chen H, Dou M, et al. Experimental analysis of the impact of sluice regulation on water quality in the highly polluted Huai River Basin, China [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2015, 187(7):45 001-45 015.
[13] 严子奇,夏军,左其亭,等. 淮河流域水环境承载能力计算系统的构建[J]. 资源科学,2009,31(7):1 150-1 157.
[14] 梁静静,左其亭,窦明. 淮河流域水生态区划研究[J]. 水电能源科学,2011,29(1):20-22.
[15] SL 219-2013,水环境监测规范[S].
[16] 国家环保局. 水生生物监测手册[M]. 南京:东南大学出版社,1993:18-25.
[17] 罗民波,陆健健,王云龙,等. 东海浮游植物数量分布与优势种[J]. 生态学报,2007,27(12):5 076-5 085.
[18] Carlson R E. A trophic state index for lakes[J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 1977,22:361-369.
[19] 柴毅,彭婷,郭坤,等. 2012年夏季长湖浮游植物群落特征及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 植物生态学报,2014,38(8):857-867.
[20] 金相灿,屠清瑛. 湖泊富营养化调查规范[M]. 2版. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,1990.
[21] 李利强,黄代中,熊剑,等. 洞庭湖浮游植物增长的限制性营养元素研究[J]. 生态环境学报,2014,23(2):283-288.
[22] Mackey K R M, Labiosa R Q, Calhoun M, et al. Phosphorus availability, phytoplankton community dynamics, and taxon- specific phosphorus status in the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea [J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 2007,52(2):873-885.
[23] 黄文钰,高光,舒金华,等. 含磷洗衣粉对太湖藻类生长繁殖的影响[J]. 湖泊科学,2003,15(4):326-330.
[24] 李芳芳,董芳,段梦,等. 大辽河水系夏季浮游植物群落结构特征及水质评价[J]. 生态学杂志,2011,30(11):2 489-2 496.
[25] 周振明,陈朝述,刘可慧,等. 漓江桂林市区段夏季浮游植物群落特征与水质评价[J]. 生态环境学报,2014,23(4):649-656.
[26] 庞清江,李白英. 东平湖水体富营养化评价[J]. 水资源保护,2003,19(5):42-44.
[2] 贺蓉,蒋礼,郑曙明,等. 三峡库区甘井河水域牧场浮游植物群落结构及水质评价[J]. 水生生物学报,2015,39(5):902-909.
[3] Kamenir Y Z, Dubinsky T Z, Zohary T. Phytoplankton size structure stability in a meso-eutrophic subtropical lake [J]. Hydrobiologia, 2004,520:89-104.
[4] 况其军,马沛明,胡征宇,等. 湖泊富营养化的藻类生物学评价与治理研究进展[J]. 安全与环境学报,2005,5(2):87-91.
[5] Suikkanen S, Laamanen M, Huttunen M. Long-term changes in summer phytoplankton communities of the open northern Baltic Sea [J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2007,71:580-592.
[6] 陶敏,谢碧文,齐泽民,等. 沱江浮游植物群落特征及水质评价[J]. 海洋与湖沼,2016,47(4):854-861.
[7] Aizaki M. Application of modified Carlson’s trophic state index to Japanese lakes and its relationships to other parameters related to trophic state [J]. Res Rep Natl Inst Environ Stud, 1981,(23):13-31.
[8] 朱庆峰,廖秀丽,陈新庚,等. 用灰色聚类法对荔湾湖水质富营养化程度的评价[J]. 中国环境监测,2001,20(2):47-50.
[9] 张思冲,张雪萍,廖永丰. 营养度指数法在寒地湖泊富营养化评价中的应用[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报,2003,(35):416-419.
[10] 谢平,李德,陈广才,等. 基于贝叶斯公式的湖泊富营养化随机评价方法及其验证[J]. 长江流域资源与环境,2005,(14):224-228.
[11] 石永强,左其亭,窦明. 小型景观湖泊眉湖水质分析及富营养化评价[J]. 水电能源科学,2016,34(7):32-36.
[12] Zuo Q T, Chen H, Dou M, et al. Experimental analysis of the impact of sluice regulation on water quality in the highly polluted Huai River Basin, China [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2015, 187(7):45 001-45 015.
[13] 严子奇,夏军,左其亭,等. 淮河流域水环境承载能力计算系统的构建[J]. 资源科学,2009,31(7):1 150-1 157.
[14] 梁静静,左其亭,窦明. 淮河流域水生态区划研究[J]. 水电能源科学,2011,29(1):20-22.
[15] SL 219-2013,水环境监测规范[S].
[16] 国家环保局. 水生生物监测手册[M]. 南京:东南大学出版社,1993:18-25.
[17] 罗民波,陆健健,王云龙,等. 东海浮游植物数量分布与优势种[J]. 生态学报,2007,27(12):5 076-5 085.
[18] Carlson R E. A trophic state index for lakes[J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 1977,22:361-369.
[19] 柴毅,彭婷,郭坤,等. 2012年夏季长湖浮游植物群落特征及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 植物生态学报,2014,38(8):857-867.
[20] 金相灿,屠清瑛. 湖泊富营养化调查规范[M]. 2版. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,1990.
[21] 李利强,黄代中,熊剑,等. 洞庭湖浮游植物增长的限制性营养元素研究[J]. 生态环境学报,2014,23(2):283-288.
[22] Mackey K R M, Labiosa R Q, Calhoun M, et al. Phosphorus availability, phytoplankton community dynamics, and taxon- specific phosphorus status in the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea [J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 2007,52(2):873-885.
[23] 黄文钰,高光,舒金华,等. 含磷洗衣粉对太湖藻类生长繁殖的影响[J]. 湖泊科学,2003,15(4):326-330.
[24] 李芳芳,董芳,段梦,等. 大辽河水系夏季浮游植物群落结构特征及水质评价[J]. 生态学杂志,2011,30(11):2 489-2 496.
[25] 周振明,陈朝述,刘可慧,等. 漓江桂林市区段夏季浮游植物群落特征与水质评价[J]. 生态环境学报,2014,23(4):649-656.
[26] 庞清江,李白英. 东平湖水体富营养化评价[J]. 水资源保护,2003,19(5):42-44.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |