贸易战、市场开放与中国国有企业改革
|
摘要
作为有史以来规模最大的贸易战,中美贸易问题引发全球关注,也给中国提出了一个问题:是否继续开放市场?依据贸易理论,贸易将极大推升人类社会福祉,中国改革开放40年所取得的成就根本来源于扩大市场规模所获得的贸易收益。因此,中国没有理由因为贸易战而放弃长期以来坚持的开放战略。根据中美两国元首2018年12月1日在布宜诺斯艾利斯达成的声明,美国对中国提出了经济结构改革的要求。尽管此后中美贸易谈判出现挫折,但我们仍需反思中国真正的结构性问题有哪些?给中国的改革开放和经济增长带来什么影响?在此基础上为长期依靠政府力量发展壮大、但在科技创新方面明显不足的国有经济和国有企业,寻找一个符合国际惯例和市场化原则的改革出路。通过重组和激活这个庞大的经济体的活力,为中国经济增长、融入全球经济和治理体系找到新的动能。
As the largest trade war in history,the Sino-US trade issue has caused global concern,and it has also raised a question for China: Should we continue to open up the market? According to trade theory,trade will greatly promote the well-being of human society. The achievements of China's 40 years of reform and opening up are fundamentally derived from the trade gains obtained by expanding the scale of the market.Therefore,China has no reason to abandon the long-held open up strategy because of the trade war. According to the statement reached by the heads of state of China and the United States in Buenos Aires on December 1,2018,the United States has demanded economic restructuring reform from China. Despite the setbacks in Sino-US trade talks since then,we still need to reflect on China's real structural problems. What impact will this have on China's reform and opening up and economic growth? On this basis,for the state-owned economy and state-owned enterprises that have long relied on the development of government forces but are obviously insufficient in technological innovation,they are looking for a reform path that conforms to international conventions and market-oriented principles. By reorganizing and activating the vitality of this vast economy,we will find new kinetic energy for China's economic growth and integration into the global economy and governance system.
As the largest trade war in history,the Sino-US trade issue has caused global concern,and it has also raised a question for China: Should we continue to open up the market? According to trade theory,trade will greatly promote the well-being of human society. The achievements of China's 40 years of reform and opening up are fundamentally derived from the trade gains obtained by expanding the scale of the market.Therefore,China has no reason to abandon the long-held open up strategy because of the trade war. According to the statement reached by the heads of state of China and the United States in Buenos Aires on December 1,2018,the United States has demanded economic restructuring reform from China. Despite the setbacks in Sino-US trade talks since then,we still need to reflect on China's real structural problems. What impact will this have on China's reform and opening up and economic growth? On this basis,for the state-owned economy and state-owned enterprises that have long relied on the development of government forces but are obviously insufficient in technological innovation,they are looking for a reform path that conforms to international conventions and market-oriented principles. By reorganizing and activating the vitality of this vast economy,we will find new kinetic energy for China's economic growth and integration into the global economy and governance system.
引文
[1]余永定.中美贸易战的回顾与展望[J].债券,2018(8):32-34.
[2]余永定.贸易冲突或成常态中国如何应对[J].新金融,2018(9):4-10.
[3]White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy:How China’s Economic Aggression Threatens the Technologies and Intellectual Property of the United States and the World[R]. June 2018.
[4]中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所.全球政治与安全报告(2019)[M].北京.社会科学文献出版社,2018.
[5]Pierre Lemieux. Peter Navarro’s Conversion[J]. Regulation,2018(3).
[6]National Security Strategy of the United States of America[R].The White House Washington,DC,2017.
[7]习近平在博鳌亚洲论坛2018年年会开幕式上的主旨演讲[EB/OL].[2018-04-10].新华社,http://www.xinhuanet.com/2018-04/10/c_1122659873.htm.
[8]习近平.共建创新包容的开放型世界经济——在首届中国国际进口博览会开幕式上的主旨演讲[EB/OL].[2018-11-05].中华人民共和国中央人民政府网,http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2018/content_5343724.htm.
[9]张宇燕.探源开放理论逻辑理解互利共赢战略[N].经济日报,2019-05-14.
[10]刘世锦.中速增长的潜力在什么地方[N].北京日报,2019-05-06.
[11]王小鲁,余静文,樊纲.中国市场化八年进程报告[N].财经,2016-04-11.
[12]Office of the United States Trade Representative:Joint Statement on Trilateral Meeting of the Trade Ministers of the United States[R].Japan,and the European Union,2018.
[13]中国社会科学院工业经济研究所.中国工业发展报告(2018)[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2018.
[14]曹建海.重在完善产能过剩的防范机制[J].求是,2015(8):50-52.
[15]黄宗智.重新认识中国劳动人民——劳动法规的历史演变与当前的非正规经济[J].开放时代,2013(5):56-73.
[16]华生.非公经济也是社会主义和共产党执政的重要基础[J].董事会,2018(11):72-75.
[2]余永定.贸易冲突或成常态中国如何应对[J].新金融,2018(9):4-10.
[3]White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy:How China’s Economic Aggression Threatens the Technologies and Intellectual Property of the United States and the World[R]. June 2018.
[4]中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所.全球政治与安全报告(2019)[M].北京.社会科学文献出版社,2018.
[5]Pierre Lemieux. Peter Navarro’s Conversion[J]. Regulation,2018(3).
[6]National Security Strategy of the United States of America[R].The White House Washington,DC,2017.
[7]习近平在博鳌亚洲论坛2018年年会开幕式上的主旨演讲[EB/OL].[2018-04-10].新华社,http://www.xinhuanet.com/2018-04/10/c_1122659873.htm.
[8]习近平.共建创新包容的开放型世界经济——在首届中国国际进口博览会开幕式上的主旨演讲[EB/OL].[2018-11-05].中华人民共和国中央人民政府网,http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2018/content_5343724.htm.
[9]张宇燕.探源开放理论逻辑理解互利共赢战略[N].经济日报,2019-05-14.
[10]刘世锦.中速增长的潜力在什么地方[N].北京日报,2019-05-06.
[11]王小鲁,余静文,樊纲.中国市场化八年进程报告[N].财经,2016-04-11.
[12]Office of the United States Trade Representative:Joint Statement on Trilateral Meeting of the Trade Ministers of the United States[R].Japan,and the European Union,2018.
[13]中国社会科学院工业经济研究所.中国工业发展报告(2018)[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2018.
[14]曹建海.重在完善产能过剩的防范机制[J].求是,2015(8):50-52.
[15]黄宗智.重新认识中国劳动人民——劳动法规的历史演变与当前的非正规经济[J].开放时代,2013(5):56-73.
[16]华生.非公经济也是社会主义和共产党执政的重要基础[J].董事会,2018(11):72-75.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |