用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于GMS实体建模的新疆某煤矿涌水量预测分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Prediction and analysis of water inflow in a Xinjiang coal mine based on GMS solid modeling
  • 作者:袁涵 ; 贾超 ; 杨晟 ; 张建配 ; 陈阳
  • 英文作者:YUAN Han;JIA Chao;YANG Sheng;ZHANG Jianpei;CHEN Yang;School of Civil Engineering,Shandong University;Institute of Marine Science and Technology,Shandong University;
  • 关键词:GMS ; 实体模型 ; 涌水量 ; 采掘次序 ; 采掘进程
  • 英文关键词:GMS;;solid model;;inflow of water;;mining order;;mining process
  • 中文刊名:中国矿业
  • 英文刊名:China Mining Magazine
  • 机构:山东大学土建与水利学院;山东大学海洋研究院;
  • 出版日期:2019-06-10
  • 出版单位:中国矿业
  • 年:2019
  • 期:S1
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:255-260+265
  • 页数:7
  • CN:11-3033/TD
  • ISSN:1004-4051
  • 分类号:TD742.1
摘要
为准确预测新疆北疆某煤矿涌水量,探讨不同方案的预测精度,基于水文钻孔等资料,利用GMS中Solid模块、Modflow模块构建出与实际相符的计算模型。对矿区首采区和二采区进行了不考虑采掘次序、仅考虑采掘次序、同时考虑采掘次序和采掘进程、大井法等4种方案的涌水量预测计算,并与实测涌水量进行对比分析。研究表明:同时考虑采掘次序和采掘进程因素时的矿区涌水量预测精度最高,矿区总涌水量为实际排水量的108.1%,不考虑采掘次序、仅考虑采掘次序和大井法的预测精度依次减小,分别是实际排水量的109.2%、127.4%和185.3%。同时考虑采掘次序和采掘进程因素时首采区涌水量预测结果为1 189m~3/d,二采区涌水量预测结果为1 347m~3/d,该方案的预测思路可为相似地质条件的矿井的涌水量预测提供借鉴。
        In order to accurately predict the water inflow of a coal mine in northern Xinjiang,the water inflow prediction accuracy of different schemes are discussed in this paper.Based on hydrological drilling and other relevant data,the solid module and Modflow module in grounder modeling systems(GMS)are used to build a calculation model that is consistent with the actual situation.The prediction and calculation of water inflow in the first mining area and the second mining area are carried out in the following four schemes,namely without considering the mining sequence scheme,only considering the mining sequence scheme,simultaneously considering the mining sequence and the mining process scheme,and the large well method scheme,and are compared with the measured water inflow.The study shows that the prediction accuracy of water inflow in the mining area is the highest when both the mining sequence and the mining process are taken into consideration,which is 108.1% of the actual water displacement.The prediction accuracy is gradually decreased in the sequence of without considering the mining sequence scheme,only considering the mining sequence scheme and the large well method scheme,which are 109.2%,127.4%and 185.3% of the actual water displacement respectively.Considering the factors of mining sequence and mining process in a simultaneous way,the prediction result of water inflow in the first mining area is 1 189 m~3/d,and that in the second mining area is 1 347 m~3/d.The prediction idea of this scheme could provide reference for the prediction of water inflow in mines with similar geological conditions.
引文
[1]黄欢.矿井涌水量预测方法及发展趋势[J].煤炭科学技术,2016,44(S1):127-130.HUANG Huan.Prediction method of mine inflow and its development[J].Coal Science and Technology,2016,44(S1):127-130.
    [2]何保,李振南,赵世杰.基于多元非线性回归分析的露天煤矿涌水量预测[J].煤炭科学技术,2018,46(5):125-129.HE Bao,LI Zhennan,ZHAO Shijie.Prediction on water inflow of surface mine based on multi-element nonlinear regression analysis[J].Coal Science and Technology,2018,46(5):125-129.
    [3]尹尚先,张祥维,徐慧,等.“大井法”中渗透系数及含水层厚度的优化[J].煤田地质与勘探,2015,43(5):53-56.YIN Shangxian,ZHANG Xiangwei,XU Hui,et al.Optimization of permeability coefficient and aquifer thickness in largewell-method[J].Coal Geology&Exploration,2015,43(5):53-56.
    [4]马青山,骆祖江.解析法和数值法在矿井涌水量预测中的比较[J].矿业安全与环保,2015,42(4):63-66,71.MA Qingshan,LUO Zujiang.Comparison of analytical method and numerical method in mine water inflow prediction[J].Mining Safety&Environmental Protection,2015,42(4):63-66,71.
    [5]李建林,李志强,郑继东,等.矿井涌水量灰色GM(1,2)预测模型[J].河南理工大学学报:自然科学版,2016,35(3):368-372.LI Jianlin,LI Zhiqiang,ZHENG Jidong,et al.GM(1,2)model for predicting mine discharge[J].Journal of Henan Polytechnic University:Natural Science,2016,35(3):368-372.
    [6]安永林,彭立敏.BP与GM(1,1)预测隧道涌水对比分析和实证[J].科技导报,2008(13):71-74.AN Yonglin,PENG Liming.Forecast water gush in tunnel based BP and GM(1,1):a case study[J].Science&Technology Review,2008(13):71-74.
    [7]龚继文,李崇明,程艳茹,等.基于GMS的山区三维地质模型及应用研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(7):1135-1141.GONG Jiwen,LI Chongming,CHENG Yanru,et al.Three-dimensional geological model and application research on the mountain area based on GMS[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2016,25(7):1135-1141.
    [8]李平,郭会荣,吴孔军,等.王河煤矿矿井涌水量数值模拟及预测[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2011,36(4):755-760.LI Ping,GUO Huirong,WU Kongjun,et al.Numerical simulation and forecast of mine discharge in Wanghe coal mine[J].Earth Science:Journal of China University of Geosciences,2011,36(4):755-760.
    [9]骆祖江,王琰,陆顺,等.基于矿井生产过程的涌水量预测三维数值模拟模型[J].煤炭学报,2010,35(S1):145-149.LUO Zujiang,WANG Yan,LU Shun,et al.Three-dimensional numerical simulation model for predicting groundwater inflow of mine[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2010,35(S1):145-149.
    [10]宫厚健,刘守强,李哲,等.基于Visual Modflow的矿井涌水量数值模拟预测研究[J].煤炭技术,2018,37(8):155-157.GONG Houjian,LIU Shouqiang,LI Zhe,et al.Prediction of numerical simulation for mine water inflow based on Visual Modflow[J].Coal Technology,2018,37(8):155-157.
    [11]范书凯,崔海明,周连碧.基于GMS的矿坑涌水量预测与环境影响分析[J].中国矿业,2015,24(S2):178-181.FAN Shukai,GUI Haiming,ZHOU Lianbi.Forecasting the mine water inflow and analyzing the impact on the environment based on the GMS[J].China Mining Magazine,2015,24(S2):178-181.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700