生态补偿收益分配方法理论探讨

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Study on Theory of Payments for Ecosystem Services Income Allocation 作者：张剑 ; 付意成 ; 赵进勇 英文作者：ZHANG Jian;FU Yi-cheng;ZHAO Jin-yong;China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research; 关键词：生态补偿 ; 收益分配 ; 移动支付 英文关键词：PES;;income allocation;;mobile payments 中文刊名：河北水利电力学院学报 英文刊名：Journal of Hebei University of Water Resources and Electric Engineering 机构：中国水利水电科学研究院; 出版日期：2019-06-15 出版单位：河北水利电力学院学报 年：2019 期：02 基金：国家自然科学基金资助项目(51409269) 语种：中文; 页：12-16 页数：5 CN：13-1428/T ISSN：2096-5680 分类号：X321

摘要

生态补偿收益分配通常指向区域/流域生态保护付出方支付现金或给予实物奖励,用于资助其增加生态系统服务价值的行为付出。生态补偿的收益分配方法已被学术界广泛研究。生态补偿项目资助执行期长,中期运行管理费用高,保护成果难以体现生态保护投入者的直接付出。在生态补偿实施的关键阶段,移动支付作为便捷的支付手段,可有效解决收益分配中的不均衡问题。移动支付可与小额信贷、微型保险和援助救济等区域/流域脱贫发展活动相结合,实现多元化支付。对于流动资金转化率高的柬埔寨、中国、坦桑尼亚和菲律宾,移动支付可用于蓄积社会分散资金,便于解决生态保护过程中的突发情况。与移动支付相结合的收益分配可降低交易成本,满足保护活动中资金的高频交易需求。基于移动支付的生态补偿收益分配方法利于改善支付隐私,提高分配透明度,增强安全性,是实现区域/流域生态补偿行为的有效、公平方法。
        The income allocation of Payments for Ecosystem Services(PES)usually refers to the cash payment or material rewards for the ecological protectors to subsidize their behaviors of adding service values in ecosystem.At present,the method of PES income allocation has been extensively studied.However,the period of implementation of PES projects is long,the operation and management cost is high,and the results of protection hardly represent the PES investment.As a convenient means of payment,the mobile payment can effectively solve the problem of imbalanced distribution of PES income at the key stage of PES implementation.Mobile payments can be combined with microfinance,micro-insurance and other regional/watershed poverty alleviation activities to achieve diversified payments.For Cambodia,China,Tanzania and the Philippines,where mobile capital conversion rate is high,mobile payments can be used to accumulate social funds to deal with the emergencies during the process of ecological protection.The allocation of income combined with mobile payments can reduce the transaction costs and meet high frequency trading needs of funds in protection activities.The income allocation method of PES based on mobile payment is useful to improve payment privacy,allocation transparency rate and safety.As a result,it is an effective and fair way to realize regional/basin PES income allocation.

引文

[1] WunderS.Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services[J].Ecol.Econ.,2015,117:234–243.
    [2]付意成,吴文强,阮本清.永定河流域水量分配生态补偿标准研究[J].水利学报,2014,45(2):142-149.
    [3]谢玲,李爱年.责任分配抑或权利确认:流域生态补偿适用条件之辨析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(10):109-115.
    [4] GSMA.State of the Industry Report on Mobile Money:Decade Edition 2006-2016.http://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/.
    [5] Shrier D,Canale G,Pentland A.Mobile Money&Payments:Technology trends[C].Massachusetts Inst.Technol.2016.
    [6] Naeem BS,Ingram JC,Varga A,et al.Get the science right when paying for nature's services[J].Science,2015,347:1206-1207.
    [7] Chapman S,Maguire R,Doshi M,et al.The Elements of Benefit-sharing for REDD+in Kenya[R].A Legal Perspective,pp.283–297.2015.
    [8] Liu J,Li S,Ouyang Z,et al.Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services[J].Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.,2008,105:9477–9482.
    [9] Thompson BS.Can Financial Technology Innovate Benefit Distribution in Payments for Ecosystem Services and REDD+[J].Ecological Economics,2017,139:150–157.
    [10] Cacho OJ,Lipper L,Moss J.Transaction costs of carbon offset projects:a comparative study[J].Ecol.Econ.,2013,88:232–243.
    [11] Kaczan D,Swallow BM,Adamowicz WL.Designing apayment for ecosystem services(PES)program to reduce deforestation in Tanzania:an assessment of payment approaches[J].Ecol.Econ.,2013,95:20–30.
    [12] Enright A,McNally R,Sikor T.An Approach to Designing Pro-poor Local REDD+Benefit Distribution Systems:Lessons From Vietnam[R].Snvworld.Org.2012.
    [13] Thompson BS,Primavera JH,Friess DA.Governance and implementation challenges for mangrove forest Payments for Ecosystem Services(PES):empirical evidence from the Philippines[J].Ecosyst.Serv.,2017,23:146–155.