灰色滞后DEA模型及其在江苏高校创业教育服务效率评价中的应用
|
摘要
实际生产活动中,投入带来的产出效应往往不是"立竿见影",一般具有时间延迟特征.考虑各种投入和产出对于整个生产活动的贡献大小不同,用灰色关联分析方法对投入产出进行权重设计,建立滞后灰色DEA模型.对36个江苏省高校创业教育服务效率进行实证测算,发现创业教育服务效率整体偏低且差异明显.结合定性分析,剖析了高校的创业教育服务质量存在问题与原因,并提出了提升高校创业教育服务效率和水平的政策建议.
In the actual production activities,the output effect is often not "immediate",generally with the characteristic of time delay.Considering the different input and output for the whole production activities of different size,using the grey correlation analysis method to design the weight of input-output,and establishing the time delay grey DEA model.The efficiency of entrepreneurship education in 36 colleges and universities in Jiangsu province is estimated,and the efficiency of entrepreneurship education is low and the difference is obvious.Based on the qualitative analysis,the problems and reasons of the quality of service in the entrepreneurship education in Colleges and universities are analyzed,and the policy suggestions are put forward to improve the efficiency and the level of entrepreneurship education in colleges and universities.
In the actual production activities,the output effect is often not "immediate",generally with the characteristic of time delay.Considering the different input and output for the whole production activities of different size,using the grey correlation analysis method to design the weight of input-output,and establishing the time delay grey DEA model.The efficiency of entrepreneurship education in 36 colleges and universities in Jiangsu province is estimated,and the efficiency of entrepreneurship education is low and the difference is obvious.Based on the qualitative analysis,the problems and reasons of the quality of service in the entrepreneurship education in Colleges and universities are analyzed,and the policy suggestions are put forward to improve the efficiency and the level of entrepreneurship education in colleges and universities.
引文
[1]徐华平.试论我国高校的创业教育[J].中国高教研究,2004(2):70-71.
[2]黄兆信,曾尔雷,施永川等.以岗位创业为导向:高校创业教育转型发展的战略选择[J].教育研究,2012(12)46.52.
[3]徐小洲,臧玲玲.创业教育与工程教育的融合——美国欧林工学院教育模式探析[J].高等工程教育研究,2014(11):103-107.
[4]李振玉,李志永.日本高校创业教育的社会支援举措探析[J].外国教育研究,2013(5):112-118.
[5]Ruskovaara E,Pihkala T.Teachers implementing entrepreneurship education:classroom practices[J].Education Training,2013(2):204-216.
[6]马占新.数据包络分析模型与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2010:35—38.
[7]Charmes,Cooper,Rhodes.Measuring the efficiency of decision making unit[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1978,12(6):429-444.
[8]曹麒麟,余蝉杉,邹易.创业风险投资效率理论及评价模型[J].决策参考,20lo(7):44-46.
[9]宋东林,付丙海,唐恒.创业型大学的创业能力评价指标体系构建[J].科技进步与对策,2011(5):116-119.
[10]刘海滨,杨颖秀,陈雷.基于AHP的大学生就业创业教育评价指标体系构建[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(6):227-232.
[11]柯健,李超.基于DEA聚类分析的中国各地区资源、环境与经济协调发展研究[J].中国软科学,2005(2):144-148.
[12]张俊容,郭耀煌.评价指标与DEA有效的关系[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2004(6):520-523.
[13]木质荣.我国大学生创业教育模式探讨[J].高等教育研究,2006(11):79—84.
[14]丁三青.中国需要真正的创业教育[J].高等教育研究,2007(3):87-94.
[2]黄兆信,曾尔雷,施永川等.以岗位创业为导向:高校创业教育转型发展的战略选择[J].教育研究,2012(12)46.52.
[3]徐小洲,臧玲玲.创业教育与工程教育的融合——美国欧林工学院教育模式探析[J].高等工程教育研究,2014(11):103-107.
[4]李振玉,李志永.日本高校创业教育的社会支援举措探析[J].外国教育研究,2013(5):112-118.
[5]Ruskovaara E,Pihkala T.Teachers implementing entrepreneurship education:classroom practices[J].Education Training,2013(2):204-216.
[6]马占新.数据包络分析模型与方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2010:35—38.
[7]Charmes,Cooper,Rhodes.Measuring the efficiency of decision making unit[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1978,12(6):429-444.
[8]曹麒麟,余蝉杉,邹易.创业风险投资效率理论及评价模型[J].决策参考,20lo(7):44-46.
[9]宋东林,付丙海,唐恒.创业型大学的创业能力评价指标体系构建[J].科技进步与对策,2011(5):116-119.
[10]刘海滨,杨颖秀,陈雷.基于AHP的大学生就业创业教育评价指标体系构建[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(6):227-232.
[11]柯健,李超.基于DEA聚类分析的中国各地区资源、环境与经济协调发展研究[J].中国软科学,2005(2):144-148.
[12]张俊容,郭耀煌.评价指标与DEA有效的关系[J].系统工程理论方法应用,2004(6):520-523.
[13]木质荣.我国大学生创业教育模式探讨[J].高等教育研究,2006(11):79—84.
[14]丁三青.中国需要真正的创业教育[J].高等教育研究,2007(3):87-94.
目录