上海绿地5种植物群落土壤酶活性及其与土壤理化性质的相关性
|
摘要
以上海市内悬铃木(Platanuu sacerifolia)、香樟(Cinnamomum camphora)和水杉(Metasequoia glyptostoboides)所构成的5种植物群落为研究对象,分析并比较5种植物群落的土壤理化性质和酶活性(蔗糖酶、脲酶和磷酸酶)季节动态的相关性.结果表明,①总体上,阔叶林土壤理化指标及土壤酶活性大于针叶林,同时,混交林土壤理化指标及土壤酶活性大于单种林;②各植物群落土壤理化指标及土壤蔗糖酶活性在秋季、冬季较高,而脲酶和磷酸酶活性在春季较高;③植物群落类型与季节交互作用对土壤理化性质无显著影响,但对土壤酶活性影响显著;④不同土壤酶之间、土壤酶活性与土壤理化性质之间均存在着不同程度的相关性.研究结果表明,混交复合群落应该成为今后城市绿地建设中主要的植物群落类型,同时,在城市绿地养护过程中应依据不同时期的土壤营养状况进行针对性管理.
To explore and compare the correlation between the seasonal dynamics of soil physical and chemical properties and soil enzyme activities(sucarse,urease,phosphatase)in Shanghai green land,soil samples under five types different plant communities which consist of Platanu sacerifolia,Cinnamomum camphora and Metasequoia glyptostroboides were collected and analyzed.Results showed that:First,soil physical and chemical indicators and soil enzyme activities were much higher in broad-leaf forests and mixed forests than those in coniferous and single-dominant forests,respectively.In addition,soil physical and chemical indicators and soil enzyme activities were relative higher in both autumn and winter,and expect urease and phosphatase activities were higher in spring.Moreover,there were significant interactive effect of plant communities and seasons on soil enzyme activities,but not on soil physical and chemical indicators.On the whole,there were various degrees of correlations between different soil enzymes as well as between soil enzyme activities and soil physical and chemical properties.These results indicated that mixed forests should be the main plant community types in the construction of urban green land,and also the aimed management of soil nutrition status at different periods during the process of urban green land maintenance also should be taken much into account in the future.
To explore and compare the correlation between the seasonal dynamics of soil physical and chemical properties and soil enzyme activities(sucarse,urease,phosphatase)in Shanghai green land,soil samples under five types different plant communities which consist of Platanu sacerifolia,Cinnamomum camphora and Metasequoia glyptostroboides were collected and analyzed.Results showed that:First,soil physical and chemical indicators and soil enzyme activities were much higher in broad-leaf forests and mixed forests than those in coniferous and single-dominant forests,respectively.In addition,soil physical and chemical indicators and soil enzyme activities were relative higher in both autumn and winter,and expect urease and phosphatase activities were higher in spring.Moreover,there were significant interactive effect of plant communities and seasons on soil enzyme activities,but not on soil physical and chemical indicators.On the whole,there were various degrees of correlations between different soil enzymes as well as between soil enzyme activities and soil physical and chemical properties.These results indicated that mixed forests should be the main plant community types in the construction of urban green land,and also the aimed management of soil nutrition status at different periods during the process of urban green land maintenance also should be taken much into account in the future.
引文
[1]刘艳,王成,彭镇华,等.北京市崇文区不同类型绿地土壤酶活性及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J].东北林业大学学报,2010(4):66-70.
[2]王国梁,刘国彬,许明祥.黄土丘陵区纸坊沟流域植被恢复的土壤养分效应[J].水土保持通报,2002(1):1-5.
[3]李腾懿,孙海,张丽娜,等.不同树种土壤酶活性、养分特征及其与林下参红皮病发病指数的关系[J].吉林农业大学学报,2013(6):688-693.
[4]方海兰,陈玲,黄懿珍,等.上海新建绿地的土壤质量现状和对策[J].林业科学,2007,43(z1):89-94.
[5]项建光,方海兰,杨意,等.上海典型新建绿地的土壤质量评价[J].土壤,2004(4):424-429.
[6]崔晓阳,方怀龙.城市绿地土壤及其管理[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2001.
[7]APARICIO V,COSTA J L.Soil quality indicators under continuous cropping systems in the Argentinean pampas[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2007,96(1-2):155-165.
[8]吴玉红,李云,郝兴顺,等.土壤质量评价国内外研究进展[J].安徽农学通报(下半月刊),2012,16:24-25.
[9]周礼恺.土壤酶学[M].北京:科学出版社,1989.
[10]KISS S,PASCA D,BULARDA M D.Enzymology of disturbed soils[J].Bularda,1998(4):1367-1368.
[11]BURNS R G,DICK R P.Enzymes in the environment:Ecology,activity and applications[J].Crc Press,2002,84(2):106-107.
[12]DICK R P.Soil enzyme activities as indicators of soil quality[C]//DORAN J W.COLEMAN D C,BEZDICEK D F,et al.Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment.USA:SSSA Special Publication,1994:107-124.
[13]DICK R P,PANKHURST C,DOUBE B M.Soil Enzyme Activities As Integrative Indicators of Soil Health[M].UK:CAB International,1997:121-156.
[14]孙云云,赵兰坡.土壤质量评价的生物指标及其相关性研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2010(5):116-120.
[15]刘为华,张桂莲,徐飞,等.上海城市森林土壤理化性质[J].浙江林学院学报,2009,26(2):155-163.
[16]戴凌,黄志宏,文丽.长沙市不同森林类型土壤养分含量与土壤酶活性[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2014(6):100-105.
[17]徐福银,包兵,梁晶,等.城市不同利用区域绿地土壤酶活性特征——以上海市为例[J].土壤,2014(2):297-301.
[18]李宁,张俊叶,司志国.郑州市公园绿地表层土壤酶活性与土壤理化性质的关系[J].西部林业科学,2014(4):123-127.
[19]郝瑞军,方海兰,沈烈英.上海城市绿地土壤有机碳、全氮分布特征[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(6):49-52.
[20]吴际友.长沙市城郊森林土壤酶活性及其与土壤理化性质的相关性[J].东北林业大学学报,2010,38(3):97-99.
[21]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:农业出版社,1998.
[22]关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
[23]任海,彭少麟,刘鸿先,等.小良热带人工混交林的凋落物及其生态效益研究[J].应用生态学报,1998(5):11-15.
[24]陈彩虹,田大伦,方晰,等.城郊4种人工林林下植被物种多样性、生物量与土壤养分相关性[J].水土保持学报,2010(6):213-217.
[25]宋亚男.上海城市公园植物群落特征与景观美学评价研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2011:133.
[26]黄宇,汪思龙,冯宗炜,等.不同人工林生态系统林地土壤质量评价[J].应用生态学报,2004(12):2199-2205.
[27]邓仕坚,张家武,陈楚莹,等.不同树种混交林及其纯林对土壤理化性质影响的研究[J].应用生态学报,1994(2):126-132.
[28]连玉武,张其水.林地土壤酶活性季节动态[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),1989(6):662-666.
[29]范艳春,王鹏程,肖文发,等.三峡库区2类典型森林5种土壤酶季节动态及其与养分的关系[J].华中农业大学学报,2014(4):39-44.
[30]陶宝先,张金池,愈元春,等.苏南丘陵地区森林土壤酶活性季节变化[J].生态环境学报,2010(10):2349-2354.
[31]李传荣,许景伟,宋海燕,等.黄河三角洲滩地不同造林模式的土壤酶活性[J].植物生态学报,2006,30(5):802-809.
[32]曾曙才,崔大方,荣波,等.深圳笔架山公园土壤性状分析[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2005,44(z1):1-6.
[33]韩新宁.土壤酶对土壤环境质量的作用及影响[J].内蒙古农业科技,2008(4):90-92.
[2]王国梁,刘国彬,许明祥.黄土丘陵区纸坊沟流域植被恢复的土壤养分效应[J].水土保持通报,2002(1):1-5.
[3]李腾懿,孙海,张丽娜,等.不同树种土壤酶活性、养分特征及其与林下参红皮病发病指数的关系[J].吉林农业大学学报,2013(6):688-693.
[4]方海兰,陈玲,黄懿珍,等.上海新建绿地的土壤质量现状和对策[J].林业科学,2007,43(z1):89-94.
[5]项建光,方海兰,杨意,等.上海典型新建绿地的土壤质量评价[J].土壤,2004(4):424-429.
[6]崔晓阳,方怀龙.城市绿地土壤及其管理[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2001.
[7]APARICIO V,COSTA J L.Soil quality indicators under continuous cropping systems in the Argentinean pampas[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2007,96(1-2):155-165.
[8]吴玉红,李云,郝兴顺,等.土壤质量评价国内外研究进展[J].安徽农学通报(下半月刊),2012,16:24-25.
[9]周礼恺.土壤酶学[M].北京:科学出版社,1989.
[10]KISS S,PASCA D,BULARDA M D.Enzymology of disturbed soils[J].Bularda,1998(4):1367-1368.
[11]BURNS R G,DICK R P.Enzymes in the environment:Ecology,activity and applications[J].Crc Press,2002,84(2):106-107.
[12]DICK R P.Soil enzyme activities as indicators of soil quality[C]//DORAN J W.COLEMAN D C,BEZDICEK D F,et al.Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment.USA:SSSA Special Publication,1994:107-124.
[13]DICK R P,PANKHURST C,DOUBE B M.Soil Enzyme Activities As Integrative Indicators of Soil Health[M].UK:CAB International,1997:121-156.
[14]孙云云,赵兰坡.土壤质量评价的生物指标及其相关性研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2010(5):116-120.
[15]刘为华,张桂莲,徐飞,等.上海城市森林土壤理化性质[J].浙江林学院学报,2009,26(2):155-163.
[16]戴凌,黄志宏,文丽.长沙市不同森林类型土壤养分含量与土壤酶活性[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2014(6):100-105.
[17]徐福银,包兵,梁晶,等.城市不同利用区域绿地土壤酶活性特征——以上海市为例[J].土壤,2014(2):297-301.
[18]李宁,张俊叶,司志国.郑州市公园绿地表层土壤酶活性与土壤理化性质的关系[J].西部林业科学,2014(4):123-127.
[19]郝瑞军,方海兰,沈烈英.上海城市绿地土壤有机碳、全氮分布特征[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2011,35(6):49-52.
[20]吴际友.长沙市城郊森林土壤酶活性及其与土壤理化性质的相关性[J].东北林业大学学报,2010,38(3):97-99.
[21]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:农业出版社,1998.
[22]关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社,1986.
[23]任海,彭少麟,刘鸿先,等.小良热带人工混交林的凋落物及其生态效益研究[J].应用生态学报,1998(5):11-15.
[24]陈彩虹,田大伦,方晰,等.城郊4种人工林林下植被物种多样性、生物量与土壤养分相关性[J].水土保持学报,2010(6):213-217.
[25]宋亚男.上海城市公园植物群落特征与景观美学评价研究[D].上海:上海交通大学,2011:133.
[26]黄宇,汪思龙,冯宗炜,等.不同人工林生态系统林地土壤质量评价[J].应用生态学报,2004(12):2199-2205.
[27]邓仕坚,张家武,陈楚莹,等.不同树种混交林及其纯林对土壤理化性质影响的研究[J].应用生态学报,1994(2):126-132.
[28]连玉武,张其水.林地土壤酶活性季节动态[J].厦门大学学报(自然科学版),1989(6):662-666.
[29]范艳春,王鹏程,肖文发,等.三峡库区2类典型森林5种土壤酶季节动态及其与养分的关系[J].华中农业大学学报,2014(4):39-44.
[30]陶宝先,张金池,愈元春,等.苏南丘陵地区森林土壤酶活性季节变化[J].生态环境学报,2010(10):2349-2354.
[31]李传荣,许景伟,宋海燕,等.黄河三角洲滩地不同造林模式的土壤酶活性[J].植物生态学报,2006,30(5):802-809.
[32]曾曙才,崔大方,荣波,等.深圳笔架山公园土壤性状分析[J].中山大学学报(自然科学版),2005,44(z1):1-6.
[33]韩新宁.土壤酶对土壤环境质量的作用及影响[J].内蒙古农业科技,2008(4):90-92.
目录