基于集对分析的云南省临沧市烤烟化学品质综合评价
|
摘要
采用集对分析法,考虑了等级标准边界的模糊性,避免了直接确定联系度中的不确定系数,对临沧市凤庆县、临翔区、永德县和云县2004年和2005年烤烟烟叶化学品质进行了综合评价;并将集对分析法与指数和法进行了比较。结果表明:总体上临沧烤烟化学品质较好,永德县烟叶化学品质等级最高,为最好的Ⅰ级,且年际间稳定,而其余3县(区)烟叶化学品质等级为Ⅰ~Ⅲ级,年际间较不稳定,应注重栽培技术和管理水平的提高;集对分析方法的评价结果较指数和法更合理,而且评价结果简明、直观。
A comprehensive assessment of chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco from Fengqing county,Linxiang district,Yongde and Yun county of Lincang city in 2004 and 2005 was carried out based on set pair analysis(SPA) method.Fuzziness of grade boundary and determination of uncertainty coefficient and the SPA was compared with exponential sum method.Results showed that chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco from Lincang city was high generally,while that in Yongde county maintain stability at top grade,and the other three counties(or district),however,ranged from Grade Ⅰto Grade Ⅲ in different years.It was suggested that the level of cultivation techniques and managements need to be improved in the three counties(or district).SPA method was more reasonable,concise,and direct by comparison.
A comprehensive assessment of chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco from Fengqing county,Linxiang district,Yongde and Yun county of Lincang city in 2004 and 2005 was carried out based on set pair analysis(SPA) method.Fuzziness of grade boundary and determination of uncertainty coefficient and the SPA was compared with exponential sum method.Results showed that chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco from Lincang city was high generally,while that in Yongde county maintain stability at top grade,and the other three counties(or district),however,ranged from Grade Ⅰto Grade Ⅲ in different years.It was suggested that the level of cultivation techniques and managements need to be improved in the three counties(or district).SPA method was more reasonable,concise,and direct by comparison.
引文
[1]孟祥东,张学杰,赵铭钦,等.灰色局势决策在烤烟品种综合评价中的应用[J].中国农业大学学报,2010,15(1):95-98.
[2]薛超群,尹启生,王信民,等.模糊综合评判在化学成分评价烟叶可用性中的应用[J].烟草科技,2007(4):62-64.
[3]章新军,黎妍妍,许自成,等.河南烤烟外观与内在质量的综合评价[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(7):1953-1954,1959.
[4]童英伟,刘志斌,常欢.集对分析法在河流水质评价中的应用[J].安全与环境学报,2008,8(6):84-86.
[5]聂艳,周勇,雷文华,等.基于集对分析法的农田土壤环境质量评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(3):396-400.
[6]刘家勇,陈学宽,吴才文,等.同异分析法及其联系势测验在甘蔗品种区域化试验中的应用[J].西南农业学报,2008,21(3):613-617.
[7]邱尔发,彭镇华,王成,等.城市绿化竹子生态适应性评价[J].生态学报,2006,26(9):2896-2904.
[8]倪克平,范铁桢,胡建军.基于同异反态势排序的河南烤烟化学成分指标评价[J].烟草科技,2004(3):28-30,34.
[9]赵克勤,宣爱理.集对分析——一种新的不确定性理论方法与应用[J].系统工程,1996,14(1):18-23,73.
[10]王彦亭,谢剑平,李志宏.中国烟草种植区划[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
[11]Wang WS,JinJL,DingJ,et al.Anewapproachto water re-source systemassessment-set pair analysis method[J].Scienceof China Series E:Technological Sciences,2009,52(10):3017-3023.
[12]程乾生.属性识别理论模型及其应用[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,1997,33(1):12-20.
[13]云南省烟草科学研究所.云南烟叶主要化学成分分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.
[14]赵克勤.集对分析对不确定性的描述和处理[J].信息与控制,1995,24(3):162-166.
[15]王文圣,李跃清,金菊良,等.水文水资源集对分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
[2]薛超群,尹启生,王信民,等.模糊综合评判在化学成分评价烟叶可用性中的应用[J].烟草科技,2007(4):62-64.
[3]章新军,黎妍妍,许自成,等.河南烤烟外观与内在质量的综合评价[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(7):1953-1954,1959.
[4]童英伟,刘志斌,常欢.集对分析法在河流水质评价中的应用[J].安全与环境学报,2008,8(6):84-86.
[5]聂艳,周勇,雷文华,等.基于集对分析法的农田土壤环境质量评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(3):396-400.
[6]刘家勇,陈学宽,吴才文,等.同异分析法及其联系势测验在甘蔗品种区域化试验中的应用[J].西南农业学报,2008,21(3):613-617.
[7]邱尔发,彭镇华,王成,等.城市绿化竹子生态适应性评价[J].生态学报,2006,26(9):2896-2904.
[8]倪克平,范铁桢,胡建军.基于同异反态势排序的河南烤烟化学成分指标评价[J].烟草科技,2004(3):28-30,34.
[9]赵克勤,宣爱理.集对分析——一种新的不确定性理论方法与应用[J].系统工程,1996,14(1):18-23,73.
[10]王彦亭,谢剑平,李志宏.中国烟草种植区划[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
[11]Wang WS,JinJL,DingJ,et al.Anewapproachto water re-source systemassessment-set pair analysis method[J].Scienceof China Series E:Technological Sciences,2009,52(10):3017-3023.
[12]程乾生.属性识别理论模型及其应用[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,1997,33(1):12-20.
[13]云南省烟草科学研究所.云南烟叶主要化学成分分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.
[14]赵克勤.集对分析对不确定性的描述和处理[J].信息与控制,1995,24(3):162-166.
[15]王文圣,李跃清,金菊良,等.水文水资源集对分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
目录