Residual determination and risk assessment of buprofezin in plum (Prunus domestica) grown in open-field conditions following the application of three different formulations

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Md. Humayun Kabir ; A.M. Abd El-Aty ; Sung-Woo Kim ; Han Sol Lee ; Md. Musfiqur Rahman ; Young-Jun Lee ; Hyung Suk Chung ; Truong Lieu ; Jeong-Heui Choi ; Ho-Chul Shin ; Geon-Jae Im ; Su Myeong Hong and Jae-Han Shim
• 刊名：Biomedical Chromatography
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：November 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：30
• 期：11
• 页码：1721-1727
• 全文大小：477K
• ISSN：1099-0801

文摘

This study was conducted to characterize the residual level and perform a risk assessment on buprofezin formulated as an emulsifiable concentrate, wettable powder, and suspension concentrate over various treatment schedules in plum (Prunus domestica). The samples were extracted with an AOAC quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe, ‘QuEChERS’, method after major modifications. As intrinsic interferences were observed in blank plum samples following dispersive-solid phase extraction (consisting of primary secondary amine and C₁₈ sorbents), amino cartridges were used for solid-phase extraction. Analysis was carried out using liquid chromatography with diode array detection and confirmed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. The method showed excellent linearity with determination coefficient (R² = 1) and satisfactory recoveries (at two spiking levels, 0.5 and 2.5 mg/kg) between 90.98 and 94.74% with relative standard deviation (RSD) ≤8%. The limit of quantification (0.05 mg/kg) was considerably lower than the maximum residue limit (2 mg/kg) set by the Codex Alimentarius. Absolute residue levels for emulsifiable concentrates were highest, perhaps owing to the dilution rate and adjuvant. Notably, all formulation residues were lower than the maximum residue limit, and safety data proved that the fruits are safe for consumers. Copyright