Incorporating seed fate into plant-frugivore networks increases interaction diversity across plant regeneration stages
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Isabel Donoso ; Daniel Garcí ; a ; Javier Rodrí ; guez-Pé ; rez and Daniel Martí ; nez
- 刊名：Oikos
- 出版年：2016
- 出版时间：December 2016
- 年：2016
- 卷：125
- 期：i12
- 页码：1762-1771
- 全文大小：1935K
- ISSN：1600-0706
文摘
Plant–animal mutualistic interactions, such as pollination and seed dispersal, affect ecosystem functioning by driving plant population dynamics. However, little is known of how the diversity of interactions in these mutualistic networks determines plant regeneration dynamics. To fill this gap, interaction networks should not only account for the number of seeds dispersed by animals, but also for seed fate after dispersal. Here, we compare plant–animal networks at both the seed dispersal and seedling recruitment stage to evaluate how interaction diversity, represented by different network metrics, changes throughout the process of plant regeneration. We focused on a system with six species of frugivorous birds and three species of fleshy-fruited trees in the temperate secondary forest of the Cantabrian Range (northern Iberian Peninsula). We considered two plant cohorts corresponding to two fruiting years showing strong differences in fruit and frugivore abundance. Seed dispersal interactions were estimated from a spatially-explicit, field-validated model predicting tree and bird species-specific seed deposition in different microhabitats. These interactions were further transformed into interactions at the seedling recruitment stage by accounting for plant- and microhabitat-specific seed fates estimated from field sampling. We found that network interaction diversity varied across plant regeneration stages and cohorts, both in terms of the evenness and the number of paired interactions. Tree–bird interactions were more evenly distributed across species pairs at the recruitment stage than at the seed deposition stage, although some interactions disappeared in the seed-to-seedling transition for one plant cohort. The variations in interaction diversity were explained by between-plant differences in post-dispersal seed fate and in inter-annual fruit production, rather than by differences between frugivores in seed deposition patterns. These results highlight the need for integrating plant traits and disperser quality to predict the functional outcome of plant–animal mutualistic networks.