Clinical performance of Siemens digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard supplementary mammography for the assessment of screen-detected soft-tissue abnormalities: a multi-reader study

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：P. Whelehan^a ; ^{p.j.whelehan@dundee.ac.uk} ; S.H. Heywang-Kö ; brunner^b ; S.J. Vinnicombe^a ; A. Hacker^b ; A. Jä ; nsch^b ; A. Hapca^a ; R. Gray^c ; M. Jenkin^d ; K. Lowry^e ; R. Oeppen^f ; M. Reilly^g ; M. Stahnke^f ; A. Evans^a
• 刊名：Clinical Radiology
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：January 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：72
• 期：1
• 页码：95.e9-95.e15
• 全文大小：301 K
• 卷排序：72

文摘

Single-view Siemens DBT has equivalent accuracy to supplementary mammographic assessment. The auROC curve was 0.870 for DBT and 0.857 for standard supplementary mammography (p=0.4890). DBT allows better detection of extra cancer foci compared to standard supplementary mammography.