CAD Detection in Patients With Intermediate-High Pre-Test Probability: Low-Dose CT Delayed Enhancement Detects Ischemic Myocardial Scar With Moderate Accuracy But Does Not Improve Performance of a Stress-Rest CT Perfusion Protocol

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Nuno Bettencourt ; Nuno Dias Ferreira ; Daniel Leite ; M¨®nica Carvalho ; Wilson da Silva Ferreira ; Andreas Schuster ; Amedeo Chiribiri ; Adelino Leite-Moreira ; Jos¨¦ Silva-Cardoso ; Eike Nagel ; Vasco Gama
• 关键词：CMR ; delayed enhancement ; MDCT ; tomography
• 刊名：JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
• 出版年：2013
• 出版时间：October, 2013
• 年：2013
• 卷：6
• 期：10
• 页码：1062-1071
• 全文大小：718 K

文摘

| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

Objectives

This study sought to compare computed tomography delayed enhancement (CTDE) against cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) for detection of ischemic scar and to test the additive value of CTDE as part of a comprehensive multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) stress-rest protocol including computed tomography perfusion (CTP) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) for the diagnosis of significant coronary artery disease (CAD).

Background

CTDE has been recently described as a promising tool for noninvasive detection of myocardial scar, similarly to CMR-LGE techniques. Despite its theoretical potential as an adjunctive tool to improve MDCT accuracy for detection of CAD, its clinical performance has not been validated.

Methods

One hundred five symptomatic patients with suspected CAD (age 62.0 ¡À 8.0 years, 67 % men) underwent MDCT, CMR, and x-ray invasive coronary angiography. The MDCT protocol consisted of calcium scoring, stress CTP under adenosine 140 ¦Ìg/kg/min, rest CTP?+ CTA, and a low-dose radiation prospective scan for detection of CTDE. CMR-LGE was used as the reference standard for assessment of scar. Functionally significant CAD was defined as the presence of ¡Ý90 % stenosis/occlusion or fractional flow reserve measurements ¡Ü0.80 in vessels >2 mm.

Results

CTDE had good accuracy (90 % ) for ischemic scar detection with low sensitivity (53 % ) but excellent?specificity (98 % ). Positive and negative predictive values were 82 % and 91 % , respectively. On a patient-based model, MDCT protocol without integration of CTDE results had a sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 90 % , 81 % , 80 % , and 90 % , respectively, for the detection of functionally significant CAD. Addition of CTDE results did not improve MDCT performance (90 % , 77 % , 77 % , and 90 % , respectively).

Conclusions

CTDE has moderate accuracy for detection of ischemic scar in patients with suspected CAD. Integration of CTDE into a comprehensive MDCT protocol including stress-rest CTP and CTA does not improve MDCT accuracy for detection of significant CAD in intermediate-to-high pre-test probability populations.