A novel approach for assessment of cancer predisposing roles of GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes: use of putatively cancer resistant elderly tumor-free smokers as the referents

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Belogubova ; Evgeniya V. ; Togo ; Alexandr V. ; Karpova ; Maria B. ; Kuligina ; Ekatherina Sh. ; et. al.
• 关键词：GSTM1 ; GSTT1 ; Polymorphism ; Genotype ; Lung cancer ; Predisposition ; Elderly
• 刊名：Lung Cancer
• 出版年：2004
• 出版时间：March, 2004
• 年：2004
• 卷：43
• 期：3
• 页码：259-266
• 全文大小：102 K

文摘

We applied an alternative approach to assess the controversial evidence for the role of GSTM1 and GSTT1 deficiencies (null genotypes) in cancer susceptibility. In this study setting, the prevalence of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes in the lung cancer patients (LCs, n=167) were compared with those in the group of putatively cancer resistant individuals, i.e. elderly tumor-free donors (EDs, n=324). Healthy middle-aged donors (HDs, n=339) were used as another comparison group. Our results support the previous conclusions of a modest protective effect associated with presence of at least one functional copy of GSTM1 gene; the prevalence of GSTM1 deficiency in LCs (54 % ) did not differ from that observed in HDs (54 % ), but showed a significant increase when compared with EDs (45 % ) (OR=1.46, 95 % CI=1.00–2.12). Furthermore, in agreement with mechanistic considerations, the GSTM1 null genotypes were more prevalent in squamous cell carcinoma patients (58 % ) and in lung cancer patients with seemingly low cumulative carcinogen exposure dose (non-smokers: 63 % ; patients aged below 50 years: 76 % ). Contrary to GSTM1, no significant effect in the lung cancer proneness was observed for the GSTT1 genotypes. The results of this study are thus in good agreement with the body of literature data, including several published meta-analyses. Consequently, the suggested study design involving additional “cancer resistant” group of non-affected subjects appears to provide highly demonstrative data and to be well suited for pilot investigations and for resolving controversial issues.