A Systematic Review of Endophthalmitis after Microincisional versus 20-Gauge Vitrectomy
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

Background

Endophthalmitis is a rare but severe complication of vitrectomy.

Clinical Relevance

Post-surgical endophthalmitis is suspected to be more frequent after microincisional (23- and 25-gauge) compared with standard (20-gauge) vitrectomy.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review of studies that compared microincisional and standard vitrectomy by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE up to November 2012. We used the Bayesian meta-analysis method to compute the odds ratio (OR) of endophthalmitis. We conducted subgroup analyses to compare the effect of different incision types and use of perioperative antibiotics.

Results

We identified 3 small randomized and 18 nonrandomized studies that reported 68 cases of endophthalmitis in 148?643 participants. The overall OR of endophthalmitis for microincisional versus standard vitrectomy was 2.3 (95 % credible interval [CrI], 0.8-5.8). We found an increased risk of endophthalmitis using a microincisional straight approach compared with standard vitrectomy (OR, 15.1; 95 % CrI, 2.01-179), but not for a beveled approach (OR, 0.82; 95 % CrI, 0.23-2.28). The OR of studies that reported on mixed microincision was between these 2 values (OR, 4.4; 95 % CrI, 1.32-14.3). We estimated that the overall rate of endophthalmitis with 20-gauge vitrectomy was 3 cases in 10?000 procedures, and the probability that a beveled microincision increases the rate of endophthalmitis to more than 6 or 9 events was small (no more than 5 % or 1 % , respectively).

Conclusions

We did not find an increased risk of endophthalmitis for microincisional vitrectomy compared with standard vitrectomy. The beveled approach seems to be safer than a straight approach, supporting the current recommendation of its adoption in microincisional vitrectomy. However, these findings must be interpreted cautiously because of the small number of endophthalmitis events reported from included studies.

Financial Disclosure(s)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700