Ranolazine for rhythm control in atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
Available pharmacological options for rhythm control strategy in atrial fibrillation (AF) are limited by sub-optimal efficacy and potentially serious adverse events. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to determine the efficacy and safety of ranolazine for AF management.MethodsThe present meta-analysis was conducted according to current recommendations (CRD42016039000). Two large medical databases (MEDLINE and Scopus) were systematically searched and from that eight randomized clinical trials and two non-randomized observational studies were identified. The primary endpoint was to determine the efficacy of ranolazine to prevent AF episodes. Secondary efficacy endpoints were: efficacy in converting AF to sinus rhythm, time to conversion, and reduction in AF burden. Safety endpoints included death, serious adverse events, and QTc prolongation.ResultsRanolazine was found to be effective in reducing the risk of AF when compared to control (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.29–0.76; p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis showed a larger effect size in post-operative AF (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.11–0.77; p = 0.03) when compared to no post-operative AF (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.54–0.83; p = 0.005). Ranolazine increased the chances of successful cardioversion when added to amiodarone over amiodarone alone (OR 3.11; 95% CI 1.42–6.79; p = 0.004) while significantly reducing time to conversion (SMD − 2.83 h; 95% CI − 4.69 – − 0.97 h; p < 0.001). Overall risks of death, adverse events, and QTc prolongation were comparable between ranolazine and control group.ConclusionsRanolazine is an effective option when used for rhythm control strategy in AF. The use of ranolazine seems to be safe and associated with few adverse events.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700