Reliability and Validity of the Resistiveness to Care Scale Among Cognitively Impaired Older Adults

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Elizabeth Galik ; PhD ; CRNP ; FAANP<sup>asup><sup> ; sup><sup>galikbeth@gmail.comsup><sup> ; sup><sup>galik@son.umaryland.edusup> ; Barbara Resnick ; PhD ; CRNP ; FAAN ; FAANP<sup>asup> ; Erin Vigne ; MA ; RN<sup>asup> ; Sarah Dee Holmes ; MSW<sup>bsup> ; Victoria Nalls ; MS ; CRNP<sup>asup>
• 关键词：Dementia ; resistiveness to care ; behavior ; nursing home
• 刊名：Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：January 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：18
• 期：1
• 页码：59-64
• 全文大小：239 K
• 卷排序：18

文摘

Resistiveness to care is behavior that prevents or interferes with caregivers&rsquo; performing or assisting with activities of daily living and puts residents at risk for inappropriate use of antipsychotic drugs, other restraining interventions, social isolation, and physical abuse. The purpose of this study was to establish the psychometric properties of a previously developed Resistiveness to Care measure.ProceduresThis was a descriptive study using baseline data from an ongoing randomized controlled trial testing a Function and Behavior Focused Care (FBFC) intervention. Residents were eligible to participate if they were 55 years of age or older, had a Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) score of 15 or less, and were not enrolled in hospice or admitted for subacute care. Descriptive information included age, race, gender, cognitive status, and marital status. In addition to the Resistance to Care Scale, the Barthel Index, the Physical Activity Survey in Long Term Care (PAS-LTC), and the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) were completed. Psychometric testing was done using Rasch analysis and the Winsteps statistical program.Main findingsThe participants were moderate to severely cognitively impaired (MMSE of 7.23), functionally dependent (Barthel Index 47.31, SD 27.59), and engaged in only 134.17 (SD = 207.32) minutes of physical activity daily. Reliability was supported based on a Cronbach alpha of 0.84 and the DIF analysis, as there was no difference in function of the items between male and female participants. Validity was supported as all items fit the measurement model based on INFIT and OUTFIT statistics.ConclusionsThe findings support the reliability and validity of the Resistiveness to Care Scale for use with older adults with dementia in nursing home settings. Future work with the measure may benefit from the addition of items that are easier to endorse with regard to resistiveness to care (shutting eyes or spitting out food may be useful additions).