On granite discrimination diagrams [(K2O + Na2O)/CaO vs. Zr + Nb + Ce + Y (ppm) and Zr (ppm) vs. Ga/Al10,000] the KL and MF plutons plot within the A-type field, whereas the LG pluton compositions are divided between A-type and fractionated granite fields (I-, S- and M-types). On tectonic discrimination diagrams (Y vs. Nb ) the MF and KL granites plot in the “within-plate” granite field, but the LG pluton plots across several fields including “within-plate” and “volcanic arc plus syn-collisional” fields. Consequently the tectonic classification on a geochemical basis for the LG pluton is unclear.
Based on thermal metamorphic mineral assemblages, normative Q–Ab–Or plots, and Q–Ab–Or–H2O experimental data (Johannes and Holtz, 1996), crystallization temperatures and pressures are estimated to range from 750 to 850 °C and 200 to 500 MPa, respectively. The assemblage of titanite + magnetite + quartz suggests crystallization at low fO2 [confirmed by Fe/(Fe + Mg) vs. [4] Al microprobe analyses of calcic amphibole] and a water content of less than 1.5 wt. % (Wones, 1989). Like other Town Mountain-type plutons, the MF, KL, and LG granites display comparable iron contents at similar alkali and silica enrichments.
Melting models (Ba vs. Sr) suggest the MF, KL, and LG plutons may have evolved from the partial melting (anatexis) of juvenile, tonalitic, lower crustal rocks, followed by plagioclase and pyroxene dominated fractionation. Nd isotopic data for the MF pluton (εNd = + 3.4 at 1.06 Ga; Patchett and Ruiz, 1989) and whole-rock δ18O values for the MF, KL, and LG plutons (+ 7.0 < δ18O >+10.1‰; Rangel et al., 2008) suggest that the magmas in the eastern Llano Uplift may contain a significant mantle component, whereas relatively high δ18O values (+ 9.3 to + 9.7‰; Bebout and Carlson, 1986) for other coeval TMG rocks suggest that a significant crustal component is involved.
Whole-rock and trace-element chemistry indicate that the MF and KL plutons, along with the coarser grained textures of the LG pluton, are ‘A-type’ granites. However, with no coeval mafic dikes, syenitic compositions, or volcanic rocks it is clear that the TMG plutons do not represent anorogenic granites. The available evidence is most compatible with emplacement of the TMG plutons in a post-orogenic (Grenville), relaxation and extensional (i.e., slab breakoff) setting.