Hierarchies of Self-Organizing Maps for action recognition

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Miriam Buonamente^a ; ^{miriam.buonamente@unipa.it" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Haris Dindo^a ; ^{haris.dindo@unipa.it" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Magnus Johnsson^b ; ^{magnus.johnsson@lucs.lu.se" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}
• 关键词：Self-Organizing Map ; Neural network ; Action recognition ; Hierarchical models ; Intention understanding
• 刊名：Cognitive Systems Research
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：September 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：39
• 期：Complete
• 页码：33-41
• 全文大小：1552 K

文摘

We propose a hierarchical neural architecture able to recognise observed human actions. Each layer in the architecture represents increasingly complex human activity features. The first layer consists of a SOM which performs dimensionality reduction and clustering of the feature space. It represents the dynamics of the stream of posture frames in action sequences as activity trajectories over time. The second layer in the hierarchy consists of another SOM which clusters the activity trajectories of the first-layer SOM and learns to represent action prototypes. The third- and last-layer of the hierarchy consists of a neural network that learns to label action prototypes of the second-layer SOM and is independent – to certain extent – of the camera’s angle and relative distance to the actor. The experiments were carried out with encouraging results with action movies taken from the INRIA 4D repository. In terms of representational accuracy, measured as the recognition rate over the training set, the architecture exhibits 100% accuracy indicating that actions with overlapping patterns of activity can be correctly discriminated. On the other hand, the architecture exhibits 53% recognition rate when presented with the same actions interpreted and performed by a different actor. Experiments on actions captured from different view points revealed a robustness of our system to camera rotation. Indeed, recognition accuracy was comparable to the single viewpoint case. To further assess the performance of the system we have also devised a behavioural experiments in which humans were asked to recognise the same set of actions, captured from different points of view. Results form such a behavioural study let us argue that our architecture is a good candidate as cognitive model of human action recognition, as architectural results are comparable to those observed in humans.