Six- and twelve-month documented removal rates among women electing postpartum inpatient compared to delayed or interval contraceptive implant insertions after Medicaid payment reform

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Amy H. Crockett^a ; ^{acrockett@ghs.org} ; Lesley Bundon Pickell^a ; ^{lbundon@ghs.org} ; Emily C. Heberlein^a ; ^{heberleine@gmail.com} ; Deborah L. Billings^b ; ^c ; ^{dbillings@newmorningfoundation.org} ; Benjie Mills^a ; ^{bmills@ghs.org}
• 关键词：Medicaid ; Postpartum contraception ; Contraceptive implant ; Nexplanon
• 刊名：Contraception
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：January 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：95
• 期：1
• 页码：71-76
• 全文大小：163 K
• 卷排序：95

文摘

This study aims to document 6- and 12-month removal rates for women receiving the contraceptive implant inpatient postpartum versus those receiving the same contraceptive method during an outpatient visit, in a setting where postpartum inpatient long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) services (devices plus provider insertion costs) are reimbursed by Medicaid.Study designWe conducted a retrospective cohort study among Medicaid-enrolled women using medical record review for all women receiving the etonogestrel implant between July 1, 2007 and June 30, 2014. We compared the percentage of women with the implant removed at 6 and 12 months as well as reasons for early removal, for inpatient postpartum implant insertions vs. delayed postpartum or interval outpatient implant insertions.ResultsA total of 4% of women (34/776 insertions) had documented implant removal within 6 months post-insertion, with no difference between postpartum inpatient and outpatient (delayed postpartum or interval). A total of 12% (62/518 insertions) of women had documented implant removal within 12 months. A lower percentage of women with postpartum inpatient insertions had the implant removed at 12 months post-insertion, compared to outpatient insertions (7% vs. 14%, p=.04). After controlling for age, parity, race and body mass index, women with postpartum inpatient insertions were less likely to have the implant removed within 12 months (OR=0.44, 95% CI 0.20–0.97). The most commonly stated reason for removal was abnormal uterine bleeding, regardless of insertion timing.ConclusionIn a setting with a Medicaid policy that covers postpartum inpatient LARC insertion, a low percentage of women who received an implant immediately postpartum had it removed within 1 year of insertion.ImplicationsA Medicaid payment policy that removes institutional barriers to offering postpartum inpatient contraceptive implants to women free-of-charge may facilitate meeting women's desires and intentions to delay subsequent pregnancy, as evidenced by low removal rates up to 12 months post-insertion. Further research with women is needed to assess how these services meet their postpartum contraceptive needs and desires to postpone or prevent subsequent pregnancy.