Cost: The missing outcome in simulation-based medical education research: A systematic review
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
| Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences

Background

The costs involved with technology-enhanced simulation remain unknown. Appraising the value of simulation-based medical education (SBME) requires complete accounting and reporting of cost. We sought to summarize the quantity and quality of studies that contain an economic analysis of SBME for the training of health professions learners.

Methods

We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsychINFO, Scopus, key journals, and previous review bibliographies through May 2011. Articles reporting original research in any language evaluating the cost of simulation, in comparison with nonsimulation instruction or another simulation intervention, for training practicing and student physicians, nurses, and other health professionals were selected. Reviewers working in duplicate evaluated study quality and abstracted information on learners, instructional design, cost elements, and outcomes.

Results

From a pool of 10,903 articles we identified 967 comparative studies. Of these, 59 studies (6.1 % ) reported any cost elements and 15 (1.6 % ) provided information on cost compared with another instructional approach. We identified 11 cost components reported, most often the cost of the simulator (n = 42 studies; 71 % ) and training materials (n = 21; 36 % ). Ten potential cost components were never reported. The median number of cost components reported per study was 2 (range, 1-9). Only 12?studies (20 % ) reported cost in the Results section; most reported it in the Discussion (n = 34; 58 % ).

Conclusion

Cost reporting in SBME research is infrequent and incomplete. We propose a comprehensive model for accounting and reporting costs in SBME.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700