Development and Early Piloting of a CanMEDS Competency-Based Feedback Tool for Surgical Grand Rounds

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Christine Fahim ; PhD (c) ; MSc^* ; Mohit Bhandari ; FRCSC ; MD ; PhD ; MSc^* ; ^&dagger ; ; Ilun Yang ; FRCSC ; MD^&dagger ; ; Ranil Sonnadara ; PhD ; MSc^&dagger ; ; ^{ranil@skillslab.ca" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}
• 关键词：grand rounds ; competency-based medical education ; CanMEDS ; evaluation fatigue ; surgical evaluation ; mixed methods research design
• 刊名：Journal of Surgical Education
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：May-June 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：73
• 期：3
• 页码：409-415
• 全文大小：681 K

文摘

Grand rounds offer an excellent opportunity for the evaluation of medical expertise, and other competencies, such as communication and professionalism. The purpose of this study was to develop a tool that would facilitate the provision of formative feedback for grand rounds to improve learning. The resulting CanMEDS-based evaluation tool was piloted in an academic surgical department.

Design

This study employed the use of a 3-phase, qualitatively-focused, embedded mixed methods approach. In Phase 1, an intrinsic case study was conducted to identify preliminary themes. These findings were crystallized using a quantitative survey. Following interpretation of these data, a grand rounds evaluation tool was developed in Phase 2. The tool was piloted in the Phase 3 focus group.

Setting

This study was piloted at an academic surgical center among members of the Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada.

Participants

Purposive sampling was used for this study. A total of n = 7 individuals participated in the Phase 1 interviews, and n = 24 participants completed the Phase 1 survey. Participants included a representative sample of medical students, residents, fellows, and staff. The tool was piloted among n = 19 participants.

Results

The proposed evaluation tool contains 13 Likert-scale questions and 2 open-ended questions. The tool outlines specific questions to assess grand rounds presenters within the structure of the 7 CanMEDS competency domains. “Evaluation fatigue” was identified as a major barrier in the willingness to provide effective feedback. Further, a number of factors regarding the preferred content, structure, and format of surgical grand rounds were identified.

Conclusions

This pilot study presents a CanMEDS-specific evaluation tool that can be applied to surgical grand rounds. With the increasing adoption of competency-based medical education, comprehensive evaluation of surgical activities is required. This form provides a template for the development of competency-based evaluation tools for medical and surgical learning activities.