Rheumatoid factor and response to TNF antagonists in rheumatoid arthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
详细信息    查看全文
文摘

Objective

To systematically analyze literature with the aim of examining whether rheumatoid factor (RF) is a predictor of response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies were conducted. All studies on the association of baseline RF (titer and/or status) and response to any TNF antagonists, or with enough information to estimate this association were included. Qualitative analysis and meta-analysis using random-effects approach by type of outcome response and RF test was performed. Risk of publication bias was also evaluated.

Results

The systematic review included 18聽studies of 4163聽identified articles, involving 5703聽patients with homogeneous baseline characteristics. The most common outcome to assess response was European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, normally merging good and moderate categories as response. The weighted mean difference (WMD) of baseline IgM RF titer in meta-analysis was higher in the non-responders group [鈭?01.58 (95% CI 鈭?56.58,鈭?6.59) I2 = 0.0]. Combined odds ratios (ORs) of positive IgM RF, positive IgA RF, and positive IgG RF to achieve good/moderate response were 1.08 (0.80, 1.47), I2 = 40.9%; 0.83 (0.39, 1.73), I2 = 39.8%, and 1.30 (0.48, 3.51), I2 = 62.9%, respectively. We did not find an association between a positive IgM RF and EULAR good response or remission.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis does not support baseline IgM RF titer as a predictor of response to TNF antagonists in RA. However, this conclusion is hampered by high heterogeneity in the studies included in this meta-analysis.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700