A robust method for suppressing motion-induced coil sensitivity variations during prospective correction of head motion in fMRI

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Zahra Faraji-Dana^a ; ^b ; ^{zfarajid@sri.utoronto.ca" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Fred Tam^b ; J. Jean Chen^a ; ^c ; Simon J. Graham^a ; ^b
• 关键词：Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Echo-planar imaging ; Multi-channel head coils ; Coil sensitivity maps ; Head movements
• 刊名：Magnetic Resonance Imaging
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：October 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：34
• 期：8
• 页码：1206-1219
• 全文大小：1809 K

文摘

Prospective motion correction is a promising candidate solution to suppress the effects of head motion during fMRI, ideally allowing the imaging plane to remain fixed with respect to the moving head. Residual signal artifacts may remain, however, because head motion in relation to a fixed multi-channel receiver coil (with non-uniform sensitivity maps) can potentially introduce unwanted signal variations comparable to the weak fMRI BOLD signal (~1%–4% at 1.5–3.0 T). The present work aimed to investigate the magnitude of these residual artifacts, and characterize the regime over which prospective motion correction benefits from adjusting sensitivity maps to reflect relative positional change between the head and the coil. Numerical simulations were used to inform human fMRI experiments. The simulations indicated that for axial imaging within a commonly used 12-channel head coil, 5° of head rotation in-plane produced artifact signal changes of ~3%. Subsequently, six young adults were imaged with and without overt head motions of approximately this extent, with and without prospective motion correction using the Prospective Acquisition CorrEction (PACE) method, and with and without sensitivity map adjustments. Sensitivity map adjustments combined with PACE strongly protected against the artifacts of interest, as indicated by comparing three metrics of data quality (number of activated voxels, Dice coefficient of activation overlap, temporal standard deviation of baseline fMRI timeseries data) across the different experimental conditions. It is concluded that head motion in relation to a fixed multi-channel coil can adversely affect fMRI with prospective motion correction, and that sensitivity map adjustment can mitigate this effect at 3.0 T.