The deposit showed good response to all the geophysical methods used (VLEM, HLEM, TURAM EM, gravity and magnetics).
There is good correlation on the ground between geophysical anomalies and those from the geochemical soil sampling.
Good response to gravity method provided confidence that it was a massive sulphide deposit.
Test drilling on the basis of recommendations from this study encountered massive sulphides.
Comparison with other massive sulphide deposits show that the deposit share a number of characteristics with them.