Thermal profiles of FC/S cycles were markedly different from FC treatments; all FC/S cooking cycles were significantly quickened by steam (RH 20–88 % ) and developed a greater temperature differences between centre and surface than the FC treated samples (RH 2–5 % ). At 120 and 140 °C, cooked FC/S products were paler (on the upper surface) and less tender than FC samples also exhibiting a significantly higher cooking loss and lower water holding capacity. The use of FC/S treatment could be particularly attractive at lower temperatures especially at 110 °C in comparison with FC, where similar cooking quality (texture, colour, water holding capacity) was achieved in a shorter time.