Clinical impact of second pathology opinion: A longitudinal study of central genitourinary pathology review before prostate brachytherapy
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
Purpose

To evaluate the clinical impact of pathology review before prostate brachytherapy.

Methods and materials

Original and reviewing pathologists' reports were retrospectively collected from 1323 men treated with prostate brachytherapy between July 1998 and October 2005 at one institution. Statistical analysis was performed pre- and post-January 2002. The clinical impact of pathology review was evaluated.

Results

Gleason Score (GS) change (GSΔ) occurred in 25.2 % (334) of cases; GS increased in 21.6 % , decreased in 2.4 % , and diagnosed malignancy in 1.2 % of cases. Post-2002, concordance in attributed GS improved, with GSΔ of 31.9–20.6 % , respectively (p < 0.001), and a reduction in the average GSΔ (p < 0.001). The clinical impact was substantial with management changing in 14.8 % of cases.

Conclusion

Concordance between the original and reviewing pathologists' GS has improved during the study period. Nevertheless, discordance persists in one of five cases. Pathology review remains essential, if treatment decisions hinge on GS.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700