Durable Improvements in Prostate Cancer Screening from Online Spaced Education: A Randomized Controlled Trial

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：B. Price Kerfoot ; Elizabeth V. Lawler ; Galina Sokolovskaya ; David Gagnon ; Paul R. Conlin
• 刊名：American Journal of Preventive Medicine
• 出版年：2010
• 出版时间：November 2010
• 年：2010
• 卷：39
• 期：5
• 页码：472-478
• 全文大小：534 K

文摘

Context

Prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is frequently performed, counter to clinical practice guidelines.

Background

It was hypothesized that an e-mail–based intervention termed “spaced education” could reduce clinicians' inappropriate screening for prostate cancer.

Design

The study was conducted as an RCT.

Setting/participants

The study involved 95 primary care clinicians in eight Veterans Affairs medical centers from January 2007 to February 2009.

Intervention

Participants were randomized into two cohorts: spaced education clinicians received four isomorphic cycles of nine e-mails over 36 weeks (zero to two e-mails per week), whereas control clinicians received no intervention. Each e-mail presented a clinical scenario and asked whether it was appropriate to obtain a PSA test. Participants received immediate feedback after submitting their answers.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was the number and percentage of inappropriate PSA screening tests ordered. Inappropriate testing was defined as use of PSA for prostate cancer screening in patients aged >76 or <40 years. Appropriateness of screening was dichotomized based on patient age at time of screening. Patients with PSA testing for non-screening reasons were excluded using a validated protocol. Logistic regression with adjustment for patient clustering by clinician was performed. Analyses were conducted in 2009.

Results

During the intervention period (Weeks 1–36), clinicians receiving spaced education e-mails ordered significantly fewer inappropriate PSA screening tests than control clinicians (10.5 % vs 14.2 % , p=0.041). Over the 72-week period following the intervention (Weeks 37–108), spaced education clinicians continued to order fewer inappropriate tests compared to controls (7.8 % vs 13.1 % , respectively, p=0.011), representing a 40 % relative reduction in inappropriate screening.

Conclusions

Spaced education durably improves the prostate cancer screening behaviors of clinicians and represents a promising new methodology to improve patient care across healthcare systems.