Development of plant communities on set-aside in England

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Nigel D.  ; Boatman  ; ;   ; ^{nigel.boatman@fera.gsi.gov.uk} ; Naomi E.  ; Jones ; Simon T.  ; Conyers ; Sté ; phane  ; Pietravalle
• 关键词：Set-aside ; Vegetation survey ; Succession ; Countryside Vegetation System ; Ellenberg value ; CSR strategy
• 刊名：Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
• 出版年：2011
• 出版时间：September 2011
• 年：2011
• 卷：143
• 期：1
• 页码：8-19
• 全文大小：864 K

文摘

A survey of land taken out of production from the early 1990s onwards under the European Union's set-aside policy in England was carried out in 2008, to record plant communities in set-aside of different ages, effects of distance from the field edge, sowing and soil type. Communities were classified using the Countryside Vegetation System (CVS), Ellenberg indicators and Grime CSR strategy. Species richness declined with distance from the field boundary. Annuals declined with age of set-aside. In older set-aside, perennials dominated, 40?0 % of species were grasses, and grasses covered over 70 % of the area. Sown areas had a higher proportion of grass species and a lower proportion of wind-dispersed species. Perennial forbs increased over time in naturally regenerated swards but decreased on sown swards. Annuals and grasses were more prevalent on light soils, with more bare ground on heavy soils. Most transects fell into CVS aggregate classes ¡®tall grassland/herb?and ¡®fertile grassland? Ellenberg fertility values decreased initially but then stabilised. Competitor scores increased, and ruderal scores declined, with age. In general, the rate of change declined with age. Although few sites had plant communities of significant conservation interest, the value of set-aside is likely to be primarily to maintain botanical diversity in intensively farmed areas, as well as providing food and habitat for fauna.