Corrigendum to: “Coincidence and fixed points for multi-valued mappings and its application to nonconvex integral inclusions” [J. Comput. Appl. Math. 283 (2015) 201-217]

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Vasile Berinde^a ; ^b ; ^{vberinde@ubm.ro" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; ^{vasile_berinde@yahoo.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; ^{vasile.berinde@gmail.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Mădălina Păcurar^c ; ^{madalina.pacurar@econ.ubbcluj.ro" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}
• 刊名：Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
• 出版年：2017
• 出版时间：February 2017
• 年：2017
• 卷：311
• 期：Complete
• 页码：718-720
• 全文大小：353 K

文摘

In a recent paper [H.K. Pathak, R.P. Agarwal, Y.J. Cho, Coincidence and fixed points for multi-valued mappings and its application to nonconvex integral inclusions, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 283 (2015) 201–217.], the authors have studied some problems on coincidence points and fixed points of multi-valued mappings.

In order to illustrate the generality of their main result (Theorem 3.2) with respect to older related results (Nadler’s, Berinde–Berinde, Mizoguchi–Takahashi and Du’s fixed point theorem), the authors presented two examples, i.e., Examples 3.3 and 3.4.

The main aim of this note is to show that Example 3.3 fails in proving the generality of Theorem 3.2 over Berinde–Berinde’s fixed point theorem.