The Remote Food Photography Method Accurately Estimates Dry Powdered Foods—The Source of Calories for Many Infants

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Abby F. Duhé ; MSAuthor Vitae ; L. Anne Gilmore ; PhD ; RD ; LDNAuthor Vitae ; Jeffrey H. Burton ; PhDAuthor Vitae ; Corby K. Martin ; PhDAuthor Vitae ; Leanne M. Redman ; PhD ; ^{Leanne.Redman@pbrc.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}Author Vitae
• 关键词：Dietary assessment ; Digital photography ; Infant feeding ; Powdered formula ; Bottle feeding
• 刊名：Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：July 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：116
• 期：7
• 页码：1172-1177
• 全文大小：559 K

文摘

Infant formula is a major source of nutrition for infants, with more than half of all infants in the United States consuming infant formula exclusively or in combination with breast milk. The energy in infant powdered formula is derived from the powder and not the water, making it necessary to develop methods that can accurately estimate the amount of powder used before reconstitution.

Objective

Our aim was to assess the use of the Remote Food Photography Method to accurately estimate the weight of infant powdered formula before reconstitution among the standard serving sizes.

Methods

For each serving size (1 scoop, 2 scoops, 3 scoops, and 4 scoops), a set of seven test bottles and photographs were prepared as follow: recommended gram weight of powdered formula of the respective serving size by the manufacturer; three bottles and photographs containing 15%, 10%, and 5% less powdered formula than recommended; and three bottles and photographs containing 5%, 10%, and 15% more powdered formula than recommended (n=28). Ratio estimates of the test photographs as compared to standard photographs were obtained using standard Remote Food Photography Method analysis procedures. The ratio estimates and the US Department of Agriculture data tables were used to generate food and nutrient information to provide the Remote Food Photography Method estimates.

Statistical analyses performed

Equivalence testing using the two one-sided t tests approach was used to determine equivalence between the actual gram weights and the Remote Food Photography Method estimated weights for all samples, within each serving size, and within underprepared and overprepared bottles.

Results

For all bottles, the gram weights estimated by the Remote Food Photography Method were within 5% equivalence bounds with a slight underestimation of 0.05 g (90% CI −0.49 to 0.40; P<0.001) and mean percent error ranging between 0.32% and 1.58% among the four serving sizes.

Conclusions

The maximum observed mean error was an overestimation of 1.58% of powdered formula by the Remote Food Photography Method under controlled laboratory conditions, indicating that the Remote Food Photography Method accurately estimated infant powdered formula.