An overview of research priorities in surgical simulation: what the literature shows has been achieved during the 21st century and what remains

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Maximilian J. Johnston ; M.B. ; B.Ch. ; M.R.C.S.^a ; ^{m.johnston@imperial.ac.uk" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; John T. Paige ; M.D. ; F.A.C.S.^b ; Rajesh Aggarwal ; M.B.B.S. ; M.A. ; Ph.D. ; F.R.C.S.^c ; Dimitrios Stefanidis ; M.D. ; Ph.D. ; F.A.C.S.^d ; Shawn Tsuda ; M.D. ; F.A.C.S.^e ; Ankur Khajuria ; B.Sc. (Hons)^f ; Sonal Arora ; Ph.D. ; M.R.C.S.^a ; on behalf of the Association for Surgical Education Simulation Committee
• 关键词：Simulation ; Training ; Education ; Curriculum ; Skills ; Competence
• 刊名：The American Journal of Surgery
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：January 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：211
• 期：1
• 页码：214-225
• 全文大小：274 K

文摘

Key research priorities for surgical simulation have been identified in recent years. The aim of this study was to establish the progress that has been made within each research priority and what still remains to be achieved.

Methods

Members of the Association for Surgical Education Simulation Committee conducted individualized literature reviews for each research priority that were brought together by an expert panel.

Results

Excellent progress has been made in the assessment of individual and teamwork skills in simulation. The best methods of feedback and debriefing have not yet been established. Progress in answering more complex questions related to competence and transfer of training is slower than other questions. A link between simulation training and patient outcomes remains elusive.

Conclusions

Progress has been made in skills assessment, curricula development, debriefing and decision making in surgery. The impact of simulation training on patient outcomes represents the focus of simulation research in the years to come.