We aimed to identify differences between the 2 forms of measuring volume in a PD unit and determine which clinical factors are associated with these differences.
Ours is an observational study of 74 patients on PD. We measured V using BIS (Vbis) and the Watson formula (Vw); 271 measurements were made with each method. We calculated the difference between Vbis and Vw in each patient and classified them into 2 groups: Difference between volumes ≥10% or <10% Vbis. We assessed the presence of several clinical parameters in our patients.
We assessed whether there were any differences between Vbis and Vw (Student t-test). We determined whether there was any association between the difference in volumes and the presence of the clinical parameters analyzed (chi square test).
V was 2.15 l higher measured by the Watson formula than with BIS (p < 0.01). In 58.67% of the measurements, the difference between Vbis and Vw was ≥10%.
Significant differences were found when comparing the presence of difference between volumes and the presence or not of diabetes mellitus (DM) (p = 0.03), hypertension (HTN) (p = 0.036), hypoalbuminemia (p < 0.01), hypoprealbuminemia (p < 0.01), low phase angle at 50 Hz (p < 0.01), high C reactive protein (p < 0.01), obesity (p = 0.027), E/I ratio (ratio between extracellular and intracellular water) ≥1 (p < 0.01) and residual diuresis (p = 0.029).
There are significant differences in the V of PD Unit patients when obtained by Watson formula or by BIS. A difference between the measurements is associated with the presence of DM, HTN, hypoalbuminaemia, obesity, malnutrition, inflammation, E/I ratio ≥1 and the absence of residual diuresis.