The effectiveness of wet-cupping for nonspecific low back pain in Iran: A randomized controlled trial

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Khosro Farhadi ; David C. Schwebel ; Morteza Saeb ; Mansour Choubsaz ; Reza Mohammadi ; Alireza Ahmadi
• 关键词：Low back pain ; Wet-cupping ; Hijama ; Iran
• 刊名：Complementary Therapies in Medicine
• 出版年：2009
• 出版时间：January 2009
• 年：2009
• 卷：17
• 期：1
• 页码：9-15
• 全文大小：259 K

文摘

Summary

Objectives

To determine the efficacy of wet-cupping for treating persistent nonspecific low back pain.

Background

Wet-cupping therapy is one of the oldest known medical techniques. It is still used in several contemporary societies. Very minimal empirical study has been conducted on its efficacy.

Design

Randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. Patients in the experimental group were offered the option of referral to the wet-cupping service; all accepted that option. The control group received usual care.

Setting

Medical clinic in Kermanshah, Iran.

Participants

In total, 98 patients aged 17–68 years with nonspecific low back pain; 48 were randomly assigned to experimental group and 50 to the control group.

Intervention

Patients in the experimental group were prescribed a series of three staged wet-cupping treatments, placed at 3 days intervals (i.e., 0, 3, and 6 days). Patients in the control group received usual care from their general practitioner.

Main outcome measures

Three outcomes assessed at baseline and again 3 months following intervention: the McGill Present Pain Index, Oswestry Pain Disability Index, and the Medication Quantification Scale.

Results

Wet-cupping care was associated with clinically significant improvement at 3-month follow-up. The experimental group who received wet-cupping care had significantly lower levels of pain intensity ([95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.72–2.60] mean difference = 2.17, p < 0.01), pain-related disability (95 % CI = 11.18–18.82, means difference = 14.99, p < 0.01), and medication use (95 % CI = 3.60–9.50, mean difference = 6.55, p < 0.01) than the control group. The differences in all three measures were maintained after controlling for age, gender, and duration of lower back pain in regression models (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Traditional wet-cupping care delivered in a primary care setting was safe and acceptable to patients with nonspecific low back pain. Wet-cupping care was significantly more effective in reducing bodily pain than usual care at 3-month follow-up.