Practice standards for emergency nursing: An international review

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Tamsin Jones ; RN ; BN (Hons)^a ; ^{tamsin.jones@monash.edu" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Ramon Z. Shaban ; RN ; PhD^b ; ^c ; Debra K. Creedy ; RN ; PhD^b
• 关键词：Clinical practice guideline ; Competency-based education ; Emergency nursing ; Graduate nursing education ; Review ; Standards
• 刊名：Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：November 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：18
• 期：4
• 页码：190-203
• 全文大小：802 K

文摘

Presentations to emergency departments (EDs) and patient acuity continue to increase. Whilst strategies to deliver safe patient care in the ED are evolving, emergency nurses need to be well educated through specialist qualifications to enable delivery of advanced patient care. This paper presents a comparative analysis of available international practice and competency standards for nurses graduating from emergency nursing courses in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Methods

CINAHL, Scopus, Ovid MEDLINE, and Embase were searched for papers, published in English, using the terms: ‘emergency’, ‘accident and emergency’, ‘nursing’, ‘competency’, ‘practice standards’, ‘scope of practice’, ‘regulation’, and ‘specialist standards’. Secondary sources from relevant reference lists and professional websites were also searched.

Results

The standards from the five countries were common across five domains: clinical expertise, communication, teamwork, resources and environment, and legal. None of the standards were specific to the emergency nursing graduate, and there was variability in the level of expertise required for which the standards apply.

Conclusions

The available practice standards demonstrated some commonality. Consideration of the utility of a universal framework for informing the development of emergency nursing practice standards and emergency nursing curriculum for nurses wishing to specialise is needed.