Hybrid revascularization, comprising coronary artery bypass graft with exclusive arterial conduits followed by early drug-eluting stent implantation, in multivessel coronary artery disease

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Cé ; dric Delhaye ; Arnaud Sudre ; Gilles Lemesle ; Laure Vanesson ; Mohamad Koussa ; Georges Fayad ; Christophe Bauters ; Jean-Marc Lablanche ; Thomas Modine
• 关键词：Hybrid revascularization ; Coronary bypass ; Drug-eluting stent
• 刊名：Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases
• 出版年：2010
• 出版时间：October 2010
• 年：2010
• 卷：103
• 期：10
• 页码：502-511
• 全文大小：196 K

文摘

Summary

Aim

To assess the feasibility and safety of a hybrid myocardial revascularization strategy combining “exclusive arterial” conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) followed by early drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods

Eighteen consecutive patients with multivessel CAD were enrolled prospectively. Within 48 hours of CABG using left internal mammary artery (IMA) to left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery with or without right IMA to non-LAD vessel in an open chest approach, DESs were implanted systematically in an additional vessel after a clopidogrel 300-mg preloading dose. This group was compared with 18 matched patients who underwent standard CABG alone using left IMA to LAD and at least one additional graft.

Results

Baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. There were 46 grafts in the CABG group and 28 in the hybrid group. In the hybrid group, 27.8 % of patients were treated off-pump versus none in the CABG group; a median of 2 (interquartile range: 1–2) stents was implanted per patient. The hybrid procedure was associated with shorter durations of cardiopulmonary bypass (77 [67–100] min versus 97 [90–105] min, P = 0.049). Major bleeding rates were higher in the CABG group, but the difference was not statistically significant (44.4 % versus 11.1 % , P = 0.06). Re-intervention for bleeding was not needed in either group. One (5.6 % ) myocardial infarction occurred in hospital in each group following CABG. At 1 year, the cumulative rates of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization) were similar (11.2 % in hybrid group versus 5.6 % in CABG group, P = 0.99). One death occurred in the CABG group and one target vessel revascularization in the hybrid group.

Conclusion

A hybrid revascularization strategy, combining conventional CABG with exclusive arterial conduits followed by early DES implantation, is feasible. One-year event rates compare favourably to those with traditional CABG alone.