Imputation of single-tree attributes using airborne laser scanning-based height, intensity, and alpha shape metrics
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Jari Vauhkonen ; Ilkka Korpela ; Matti Maltamo ; Timo Tokola
- 关键词：LiDAR ; Non-parametric estimation ; Nearest neighbor ; k-Most Similar Neighbor ; Random Forest
- 刊名：Remote Sensing of Environment
- 出版年：2010
- 出版时间：15 June 2010
- 年：2010
- 卷：114
- 期：6
- 页码：1263-1276
- 全文大小：1169 K
文摘
Forest inventories based on single-tree interpretation of airborne laser scanning (ALS) data often rely on an allometric estimation chain in which inaccuracies in the estimates of the diameter at breast height (DBH) propagate to other characteristics of interest such as the stem volume. Our purpose was to test nearest neighbor imputation by the k-Most Similar Neighbor (k-MSN) and the Random Forest (RF) methods for the simultaneous estimation of species, DBH, height and stem volume using ALS data. The predictors included computational alpha shape metrics and variables based on the height and intensity distributions in the ALS data. Separate data sets covering 1898 and 1249 dominant to intermediate trees in a typical Scandinavian stand structure were used for training and validation, respectively. RF proved to be a flexible method with an ability to handle 1846 predictors with no need for their reduction. Classification of Scots pine, Norway spruce and deciduous trees showed an accuracy of 78 % , and the estimates of DBH, height and volume had root mean square errors of 13 % , 3 % , and 31 % , respectively, when evaluated against the validation data. The two selection strategies implemented here reduced the number of candidate variables effectively without any substantial effect on the accuracy relative to the use of all predictors. Differences in k-MSN and RF imputations were marginal when the reduced sets of variables were used. Estimation accuracies could be maintained practically unchanged with only 12.5 % of the initial reference data (237 trees), provided the distribution of the observations was similar in the reference and target data. Since we used information collected in the field for extracting the ALS point clouds for individual trees, our results represent an optimal case and should nevertheless be validated against automated tree delineation.