Helical tomotherapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in the treatment of dominant intraprostatic lesion: A treament planning comparison
详细信息    查看全文
文摘

Purpose

To compare helical tomotherapy (HT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for prostate cancer irradiation while concomitantly boosting dominant intraprostatic lesions (DILs).

Methods and materials

Treatment plans of seven patients were designed for HT and IMPT (pencil beam size: 3 mm sigma). The prescribed median PTV/DIL doses were 71.4/100 Gy in 28 fractions, while satisfying ¡°safe¡± dose constraints for organs at risks (OARs) including rectum, bladder, femoral heads, penile bulb and urethra. The planner could further reduce the dose to OARs if PTV/DIL constraints were reached.

Results

IMPT achieved better dose conformity (CI = 1.11 vs 1.31, p < 0.05) and coverage (V95 %  = 97.3 % vs 95.3 % , p < 0.05) in PTV. Concerning DIL volumes, both techniques delivered the prescribed dose (Dmedian: HT = 100 Gy, IMPT = 102.1 Gy) with similar dose conformity (CI: HT = 1.49, IMPT = 1.44) and same dose homogeneity, D99 % , D1 % , while satisfying the OARs constraints.

Excepting urethra, the sparing of OARs was significantly better with IMPT; in general, the lower the dose, the greater the benefit of IMPT. Normal tissue complication probabilities for the rectum were in favor of IMPT with an absolute reduction of 3-8 % , depending on the NTCP model (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Both techniques allowed delivering 100 Gy to DILs, while complying with the OARs constraints. IMPT was superior in sparing OARs for doses up to approximately 70 Gy, with larger benefit at lower doses.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700