Survey of eye practitioners’ preference of diagnostic tests and treatment modalities for dry eye in Ghana

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Kofi Asiedu ; OD^a ; ^b ; ^{kasiedu60@yahoo.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} (Dr.) ; Samuel Kyei ; OD PhD^b ; Benedict Ayobi ; OD^b ; Frank Okyere Agyemang ; OD^b ; Reynolds Kwame Ablordeppey ; OD^c
• 关键词：Practitioners ; Patient history ; Fluorescein ; Dry eye
• 刊名：Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：December 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：39
• 期：6
• 页码：411-415
• 全文大小：266 K

文摘

This study sought to provide an evidence-based profile of the diagnosis, treatment and knowledge or opinions on dry eye among optometrists and ophthalmologists in Ghana.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional survey

Results

The responses of 162 participants are included in the analysis. The most commonly used test to diagnosed dry eye disease was tear break-up time followed by patient history. The most common symptom doctors heard from dry eye patients were burning sensation followed by foreign body sensation. The most often prescribed first- line treatment for dry eye was aqueous–based artificial tears followed by lipid-based artificial tears. Most practitioners considered meibomian gland dysfunction as the most common cause of dry eye followed by pterygium. The most often used test to guide or gauge therapeutic effect is patient history followed closely by tear break-up time. Most practitioners reported that 10%–20% of all their patients they see in a day are diagnosed of dry eye.

Conclusion

This study showed tear break up time was the main test majority of practitioners in Ghana used to diagnose dry eye but patient history was the main test used to gauge therapeutic effect over time. Burning sensation was the commonest symptom practitioners heard from dry eye patients whilst artificial tears was their main and first-line treatment for dry eye.