A randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of rotator cuff repair with or without augmentation using porcine small intestine submucosa for patients with moderate to large rotator cuff tears: a pilot study

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Dianne Bryant ; PhD^a ; ^c ; Richard Holtby ; MD ; FRCSC^b ; Kevin Willits ; MD ; FRCSC^a ; ^{kwillit@uwo.ca" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Robert Litchfield ; MD ; FRCSC^a ; Darren Drosdowech ; MD ; FRCSC^a ; Alison Spouge ; MD ; FRCPC^a ; David White ; PhD^a ; Gordon Guyatt ; OC ; FRSC^c
• 关键词：Level I ; Randomized Controlled Trial ; Treatment Study
• 刊名：Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：October 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：25
• 期：10
• 页码：1623-1633
• 全文大小：565 K

文摘

The rate of rotator cuff repair failure is between 13% and 67%. Porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) may be suitable to augment the repair.

Methods

There were 62 patients with moderate and large cuff tears randomized to repair alone (control) or augmentation with SIS (Restore Orthobiologic Implant; DePuy, Warsaw, IN, USA). Primary outcome was repair failure using magnetic resonance arthrography. Randomization occurred on completion of the repair. Patients and assessors were blind to group. Assessments occurred preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 and 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.

Results

There were 62 patients randomized (34 SIS, 28 control). Patient demographics, rotator cuff tear characteristics, and repair details were similar between groups. At 1 year, risk of failure was 52.9% (18/34) in the SIS group and 65.4% (17/26) in the control group for a risk difference of 12% (80% confidence interval, &minus;7% to 32%) or relative risk of 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.24, m>Pm> = .33) in favor of SIS. At 1 and 2 years, the mean difference between groups for patient-reported outcomes was small and consistent with chance but did not exclude the possibility of a clinically important difference. There was no statistically significant difference (m>Pm> = .50) between the SIS group (59.6 &plusmn; 38.9; range, 3-112) and the control group (52.7 &plusmn; 38.6; range, 5-112) in number of days to being narcotic and pain free (<20 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale).

Conclusion

We found no evidence that SIS-augmented rotator cuff repair provides superior outcomes in patients with moderate rotator cuff tears.