A prospective, randomized trial of integrative medicine for women with ovarian cancer

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Patricia L.  ; Judson^a ;   ; ^{Patricia.Judson@moffitt.org} ; Elizabeth L.  ; Dickson^b ; Peter A.  ; Argenta^b ; Yin  ; Xiong^a ; Melissa A.  ; Geller^b ; Linda F.  ; Carson^b ; Rahel  ; Ghebre^b ; Amy L.  ; Jonson^b ; Levi S.  ; Downs Jr.^b
• 关键词：Ovarian cancer ; Prospective ; Randomized ; Therapeutic massage ; Healing touch ; Integrative medicine
• 刊名：Gynecologic Oncology
• 出版年：2011
• 出版时间：November 2011
• 年：2011
• 卷：123
• 期：2
• 页码：346-350
• 全文大小：257 K

文摘

Objectives

Despite increased use of integrative medicine in cancer therapy, little data exist on its efficacy. This prospective, randomized, pilot trial sought to evaluate the feasibility of combined modality integrative medicine (CM-IM) in women with ovarian cancer (OvCA) and evaluate its effects on quality of life (QoL), chemotherapy toxicity and immunologic profiles.

Methods

Women with newly diagnosed OvCA requiring chemotherapy were offered enrollment. Those randomized to the experimental arm received hypnosis, therapeutic massage and healing touch with each cycle of chemotherapy. The control arm received chemotherapy without CM-IM. All patients completed QoL questionnaires prior to cycles 1, 3 and 6, and 6-months after chemotherapy. Immunologic profiles were measured. Statistical analysis was based on intent-to-treat. Student's t-test and Fischer's exact-test were used to determine differences.

Results

Forty-three women enrolled. All women randomized to CM-IM were successfully treated. There were no statistical differences between the groups in age, stage, grade, histologic cell type, CA125 levels, or surgical cytoreductive status. There was no difference in overall QoL measurements. Re-hospitalization rates, treatment delays, anti-emetic use, and infection rates were similar. Immunologic profiles revealed no difference between arms for WBC or salivary IgA levels. Women receiving CM-IM had consistently higher levels of CD4, CD8 and NK cells, although this did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions

Prospective clinical evaluation of integrative medicine for women with gynecologic malignancy is feasible. This first, pilot study of CM-IM in gynecologic oncology demonstrated no improvement in QoL or chemotherapy toxicity. Integrative medicine-associated improvements in immunologic profiles warrant further investigation.