Systematic review was conducted according to the criteria of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses group. A compound search strategy was developed to identify all relevant studies published between 01/01/2005 and 30/11/2014 using three online databases. Publications satisfying specific criteria have been identified and data extracted.
A total of 12 publications were included. We established that WGS has a higher discriminatory power compared to conventional genotyping and detects transmission events missed by epidemiological investigations. A cut-off value of <6 SNPs between isolates may predict recent transmission. None of the studies performed a head-to-head comparison between WGS and conventional genotyping using unselected prospectively collected isolates. Minimum reporting criteria for WGS studies have been proposed and quality control parameters considered.