Pattern of expenditures for plant conservation under the Endangered Species Act

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Vivian Negró ; n-Ortiz ; ^{vivian_negronortiz@fws.gov" class="auth_mail}
• 关键词：Recovery expenditures ; Plants ; Endangered species ; Priority rank ; Conservation ; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
• 刊名：Biological Conservation
• 出版年：March, 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：171
• 期：Complete
• 页码：36-43
• 全文大小：707 K

文摘

An estimated 31% of the native plant species in the United States are considered at risk of extinction, and 11% receive protection under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA). But with current and projected threats, many at risk non-listed plant species will need protection under the ESA. Recovery priority guidelines based on a ranking system exist to help identify the most cost-effective use of limited resources to recover listed species. I analyzed how expenditures on listed plants from 2007 to 2011 corresponded to this system, the species鈥?status, and the year first listed. While the majority of species listed under the ESA are plants, they received <5% of the funding for species recovery from federal and state agencies; thus they have the lowest per-species funding. Among plants, spending per species was greater for threatened than for endangered species and positively associated with recentness of listing date. Expenditure allocation was consistent with the ranking system, as higher priority species received more spending. Recovery progress could be significantly increased if more resources are allocated according to this system. In addition, I recommend: avoidance of biases that support specific projects or a few charismatic species; augmentation of the ESA budget to finance projects for the species in conflict with development and growth; cost-benefit analyses of increasing recovery funds for plants (since the cost estimated to recover a plant species average much less than a vertebrate species); and a broadened plant conservation message at local, regional and global scales.