Head-to-Head Comparison of Dobutamine and Adenosine Stress Real-time Myocardial Perfusion Echocardiography for the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease
详细信息    查看全文
文摘
We sought to determine the value of dobutamine versus adenosine real-time myocardial perfusion (MP) echocardiography for detecting coronary artery disease and the value of quantitative analysis of MP over electrocardiography, wall motion, and qualitative MP. We studied 54 patients by real-time MP echocardiography and coronary angiography. Replenishment velocity (¦Â) and an index of myocardial blood flow (An¡Á¦Â) were derived from quantitative MP. During dobutamine stress, ¦Â (1.7 ¡À 0.7 vs 2.7 ¡À 1.2; P < .001) and An¡Á¦Â (2.2 ¡À 1.0 vs 3.5 ¡À 1.6; P < .001) reserves were lower in patients with coronary artery disease. The same was observed with adenosine for ¦Â (1.7 ¡À 0.8 vs 2.5 ¡À 1.1; P < .001) and An¡Á¦Â (1.9 ¡À 0.7 vs 3.2 ¡À 1.4; P < .001) reserves. Accuracy of electrocardiography, wall motion, qualitative MP, and quantitative MP were 61 % , 76 % , 76 % , and 80 % for dobutamine and 70 % , 70 % , 76 % , and 80 % for adenosine, respectively. Quantitative MP had incremental diagnostic value over other variables during dobutamine (¦Ö2 23.7-38.4; P < .001) and adenosine (¦Ö2 26.7-59.4; P < .001). In conclusion, dobutamine and adenosine real-time MP echocardiography hold similar accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease. Quantitative MP provides incremental diagnostic information over other variables.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700