Sustainability impact assessment to improve food security of smallholders in Tanzania

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Jana Schindler^a ; ^b ; ^{jana.schindler@zalf.de" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}Author Vitae ; Frieder Graef^a ; ^{graef@zalf.de" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}Author Vitae ; Hannes Jochen Kö ; nig^a ; ^{hkoenig@zalf.de" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}Author Vitae ; Devotha Mchau^c ; ^{dvtmchau@yahoo.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}Author Vitae ; Paul Saidia^d ; ^{saidiapaul@gmail.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}Author Vitae ; Stefan Sieber^e ; ^{stefan.sieber@zalf.de" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author}Author Vitae
• 关键词：Sustainability ; Impact assessment ; Food security ; Smallholder farmers ; Agricultural upgrading strategies ; Tanzania
• 刊名：Environmental Impact Assessment Review
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：September 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：60
• 期：Complete
• 页码：52-63
• 全文大小：601 K

文摘

The objective of this paper was to assess the sustainability impacts of planned agricultural development interventions, so called upgrading strategies (UPS), to enhance food security and to identify what advantages and risks are assessed from the farmer's point of view in regards to social life, the economy and the environment. We developed a participatory methodological procedure that links food security and sustainable development. Farmers in four different case study villages in rural Tanzania chose their priority UPS. For these UPS, they assessed the impacts on locally relevant food security criteria. The positive impacts identified were mainly attributed to increased agricultural production and its related positive impacts such as increased income and improved access to necessary means to diversify the diet. However, several risks of certain UPS were also indicated by farmers, such as increased workload, high maintenance costs, higher competition among farmers, loss of traditional knowledge and social conflicts. We discussed the strong interdependence of socio-economic and environmental criteria to improve food security for small-scale farmers and analysed several trade-offs in regards to UPS choices and food security criteria. We also identified and discussed the advantages and challenges of our methodological approach. In conclusion, the participatory impact assessment on the farmer level allowed a locally specific analysis of the various positive and negative impacts of UPS on social life, the economy and the environment. We emphasize that only a development approach that considers social, economic and environmental challenges simultaneously can enhance food security.