Instantaneous preference was a stronger instrumental variable than 3- and 6-month prescribing preference for NSAIDs

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Sean Hennessy ; Charles E. Leonard ; Cristin M. Palumbo ; Xiaoli Shi ; Thomas R. Ten Have
• 刊名：Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
• 出版年：2008
• 出版时间：December 2008
• 年：2008
• 卷：61
• 期：12
• 页码：1285-1288
• 全文大小：105 K

文摘

Objective

Prescriber preference has been used as an instrumental variable (IV) in a prior study of nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) vs. selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, with preference expressed as the drug constituting the immediately preceding prescription by the same prescriber (instantaneous preference). We sought to compare the correlations between different IV measures with exposure.

Study Design and Setting

In an ambulatory electronic medical record database of university-based physicians, we compared correlations with exposure among three measures of prescriber preference: instantaneous preference, and the proportion of that prescriber's prescriptions in the past 3 and 6 months that were for an NSAID.

Results

We identified 37,934 initial NSAID/COX-2 prescriptions. The correlation with exposure was 0.283 (95 % confidence interval 0.274–0.292) for instantaneous preference, 0.197 (0.187–0.206) for 3-month preference, and 0.170 (0.160–0.180) for 6-month preference.

Conclusion

Instantaneous NSAID/COX-2 prescribing preference was most strongly correlated, and therefore the strongest IV. Future research should focus on the robustness of IV methods to violations of underlying assumptions, extension of IV methods to more than two groups, ratio measures of association, second and subsequent prescriptions per person, and time-varying exposures.