The Brazilian version of the Constant-Murley Score (CMS-BR): convergent and construct validity, internal consistency, and unidimensionality

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Rodrigo Py Gonç ; alves Barreto^a ; ^{rodrigopyy@gmail.com" class="auth_mail" title="E-mail the corresponding author} ; Marcus Levi Lopes Barbosa^b ; Marcos Alencar Abaide Balbinotti^c ; Fernando Carlos Mothes^d ; Luí ; s Henrique Telles da Rosa^a ; Marcelo Faria Silva^a
• 关键词：Clinimetrics ; Assessment ; Factor analysis ; Validity ; Shoulder
• 刊名：Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：September-October 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：51
• 期：5
• 页码：515-520
• 全文大小：266 K

文摘

To translate and culturally adapt the CMS and assess the validity of the Brazilian version (CMS-BR).

Methods

The translation was carried out according to the back-translation method by four independent translators. The produced versions were synthesized through extensive analysis and by consensus of an expert committee, reaching a final version used for the cultural adaptation. A field test was conducted with 30 subjects in order to obtain semantic considerations. For the psychometric analyzes, the sample was increased to 110 participants who answered two instruments: CMS-BR and the Disabilities of the Arm, shoulder and Hand (DASH). The CMS-BR and DASH score range from 0 to 100 points. For the first, higher points reflect better function and for the latter, the inverse is true. The validity was verified by Pearson's correlation test, the unidimensionality by factorial analysis, and the internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha.

Results

The explained variance was 60.28% with factor loadings ranging from 0.60 to 0.91. The CMS-BR exhibited strong negative correlation with the DASH score (−0.82, p < 0.05), Cronbach's alpha 0.85, and its total score was strongly correlated with the patient's range of motion (0.93, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The CMS was satisfactorily adapted for Brazilian Portuguese and demonstrated evidence of validity that allows its use in this population.